Literature DB >> 8661967

Right and left proximal femur analyses: is there a need to do both?

S L Bonnick1, D L Nichols, C F Sanborn, S G Payne, S M Moen, C J Heiss.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine if differences existed between right and left proximal femur bone mineral density (BMD) in a group of women. Participants for the study were 198 women ranging in age from 16 to 73 years. Bone mineral densities of both proximal femurs (femoral neck, Ward's area, and trochanter) were assessed using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (Lunar DPX). Mean (+/-SD) age, height, and weight of the participants were 32.9 +/- 18 years, 164 +/- 7.4 cm, and 64.9 +/- 12.1 kg, respectively. Significant differences between right and left femoral BMDs were found only in the trochanter. Overall, mean differences in BMD were low (neck = 0. 7%, Ward's = 0.2%, and trochanter = 1.9%) but individual variations were as high as 22%. Based on BMD z-scores of <-1.0, 84 women were classified as "at risk" for osteoporosis. When right and left z-scores were compared, misclassifications of at risk women were 4, 15, and 11 for neck, Ward's area, and trochanter, respectively. In conclusion, analyses of both right and left proximal femurs may not be necessary for either the researcher or the clinician.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8661967     DOI: 10.1007/bf02509376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  7 in total

1.  A comparison of dual energy radiography measurements at the lumbar spine and proximal femur for the diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  M G Griffin; R C Rupich; L V Avioli; R Pacifici
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 5.958

2.  Spine and femur densitometry at the menopause: are both sites necessary in the assessment of the risk of osteoporosis?

Authors:  J M Pouilles; F Tremollieres; C Ribot
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  The diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  J A Kanis; L J Melton; C Christiansen; C C Johnston; N Khaltaev
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Interrelationships among bone densitometry sites in normal young women.

Authors:  R B Mazess; H S Barden
Journal:  Bone Miner       Date:  1990-12

5.  Site of bone density measurement may affect therapy decision.

Authors:  K Lai; M Rencken; B L Drinkwater; C H Chesnut
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W Browner; J Cauley; K Ensrud; H K Genant; L Palermo; J Scott; T M Vogt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Long-term fracture prediction by bone mineral assessed at different skeletal sites.

Authors:  L J Melton; E J Atkinson; W M O'Fallon; H W Wahner; B L Riggs
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 6.741

  7 in total
  9 in total

Review 1.  Bone imaging: traditional techniques and their interpretation.

Authors:  Holger F Boehm; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.096

2.  The prevalence of significant left-right differences in hip bone mineral density.

Authors:  R Hamdy; G M Kiebzak; E Seier; N B Watts
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Spatial distribution of hip cortical thickness in postmenopausal women with different osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Ming Ling; Xianlong Li; Yueyang Xu; Yongqian Fan
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 2.617

4.  The diagnostic role of dual femur bone density measurement in low-impact fractures.

Authors:  Joseph C H Wong; Louise McEwan; Naomi Lee; Matthew R Griffiths; Nicholas A Pocock
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Left-right differences in the proximal femur's strength of post-menopausal women: a multicentric finite element study.

Authors:  F Taddei; C Falcinelli; L Balistreri; P Henys; F Baruffaldi; S Sigurdsson; V Gudnason; T B Harris; R Dietzel; G Armbrecht; S Boutroy; E Schileo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Five-year DEXA study of 88 hips with cemented femoral stem.

Authors:  Georgios Digas; Johan Kärrholm
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  The prevalence of significant left-right hip bone mineral density differences among black and white women.

Authors:  J D Alele; D L Kamen; K L Hermayer; J Fernandes; J Soule; M Ebeling; T C Hulsey
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Bilateral variation in radial bone speed of sound.

Authors:  H Vrahoriti; J Damilakis; G Papadokostakis; A Hadjipavlou; N Gourtsoyiannis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11-06       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Study of the variations of fall induced hip fracture risk between right and left femurs using CT-based FEA.

Authors:  Tanvir R Faisal; Yunhua Luo
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 2.819

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.