Literature DB >> 14605842

Bilateral variation in radial bone speed of sound.

H Vrahoriti1, J Damilakis, G Papadokostakis, A Hadjipavlou, N Gourtsoyiannis.   

Abstract

The aims of this study were to: (a) examine differences in speed of sound (SOS) between the right (SOS(R)) and left (SOS(L)) radius; (b) detect bone loss following proximal forearm fracture by SOS measurement at the radius; and (c) compare SOS(L) and bone mineral density (BMD) of one-third, mid-distal, ultra-distal and total region of the left radius. Two hundred eighty-seven Caucasian women (mean age 60.4+/-6.7 years) participated in this study. All subjects were right-handed. Twenty-seven women (mean age 63.6+/-8.0 years) had suffered a high-energy fracture of the right or left forearm. The SOS was assessed using a quantitative ultrasound device, whereas BMD was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The SOS(R) was significantly higher than SOS(L) (4047.5+/-121.0 vs 4026.3+/-113.4 m/s; p<0.001). The contralateral absolute difference was 1.94% (95% confidence intervals: 1.73-2.15%). In women who had suffered a fracture of their right forearm, SOS(R) was not significantly higher than SOS(L )(3989.9+/-141.8 vs 3985.0+/-151.1 m/s), whereas the bilateral difference was reduced to 1.45%. In women with a previous fracture of the left forearm, SOS(R) was significantly higher than SOS(L) (4076.9+/-92.8 vs 3992.6+/-124.0 m/s; p<0.01) and the bilateral difference was increased to 2.61%. Of the 260 subjects without fracture, 155 had greater SOS in the right radius, 102 had greater SOS in the left radius and 3 patients had equal values of SOS in both bones. Calculated correlations between SOS and BMD were weak to moderate ( r=0.27-0.41; p<0.0001 for all comparisons). The SOS measurements should be performed on both radial bones. A high-energy forearm fracture results in a decrease in SOS measured at the radius. Radial-bone SOS measurements cannot predict forearm BMD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14605842     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-003-2133-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  23 in total

1.  Broadband ultrasound attenuation imaging: influence of location of region of measurement.

Authors:  J Damilakis; A Papadakis; K Perisinakis; N Gourtsoyiannis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Density of os calcis and limb dominance.

Authors:  C E Webber; E S Garnett
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1976-02       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 3.  Quantitative ultrasound bone measurement.

Authors:  D Hans; T Fuerst; F Duboeuf
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Quantitative ultrasound and symptomatic vertebral fracture risk in Chinese women.

Authors:  A W Kung; K D Luk; L W Chu; G W Tang
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Does combining the results from multiple bone sites measured by a new quantitative ultrasound device improve discrimination of hip fracture?

Authors:  D Hans; S K Srivastav; C Singal; R Barkmann; C F Njeh; E Kantorovich; C C Glüer; H K Genant
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Comparison of bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus: site-matched correlation and discrimination of axial BMD status.

Authors:  C M Langton; D K Langton
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Comparison of bone mineral density at various skeletal sites with quantitative ultrasound parameters of the calcaneus for assessment of vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Y Hamanaka; I Yamamoto; M Takada; R Matsushita; T Ota; I Yuh; R Morita
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Right and left proximal femur analyses: is there a need to do both?

Authors:  S L Bonnick; D L Nichols; C F Sanborn; S G Payne; S M Moen; C J Heiss
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Bilateral variation in calcaneal broadband ultrasound attenuation: part I.

Authors:  I P Drysdale; H J Hinkley; N J Walters; M L Shale; D Bird
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  Is there a difference between right and left femoral bone density?

Authors:  A D Rao; S Reddy; D S Rao
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  3 in total

1.  Differences between the right and the left foot in calcaneal quantitative ultrasound measurements.

Authors:  Aydan Oral; Ayşe Yaliman; Dilşad Sindel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-03-06       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Assessment of the bilateral asymmetry of human femurs based on physical, densitometric, and structural rigidity characteristics.

Authors:  Melissa A Pierre; David Zurakowski; Ara Nazarian; Diana A Hauser-Kara; Brian D Snyder
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Digital X-ray radiogrammetry better identifies osteoarthritis patients with a low bone mineral density than quantitative ultrasound.

Authors:  Gerhard W Goerres; Diana Frey; Thomas F Hany; Burkhardt Seifert; Hans Jörg Häuselmann; Annina Studer; Dagmar Hauser; Nathalie Zilic; Beat A Michel; Didier Hans; Daniel Uebelhart
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-09-05       Impact factor: 5.315

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.