Literature DB >> 2085685

Interrelationships among bone densitometry sites in normal young women.

R B Mazess1, H S Barden.   

Abstract

Interrelations among skeletal sites were examined in a population of up to 300 normal young white women aged 20-40 years. Measurements were done on the radius shaft, ultradistal radius, and ultradistal ulna using single-photon absorptiometry (SPA) and on the lumbar spine, proximal humerus, and proximal femur using dual-photon-absorptiometry (DPA). Because of the narrow range of intrapopulation variance in these normal young women, the intercorrelations among skeletal sites were not very high; the average correlation (r) was 0.43 for bone mineral content (BMC) and 0.45 for bone mineral density (BMD). The results at any one site predicted values at other sites with a standard error of estimate (SEE) of approximately 11% for BMD and 17% for BMC. Even in this relatively homogeneous sample, measurements at a single skeletal site could not be extrapolated to indicate skeletal status at other sites. BMC, and to a lesser extent BMD, were influenced by body size much as has been observed in both men and postmenopausal women. Bone results are preferably expressed as BMD, because (a) intrapopulation variability is lower (10% versus 15% for the lumbar spine), (b) intercorrelations among skeletal sites, and even among adjacent vertebrae, are higher for BMD, and (c) the influence of body size on BMD is lower (the average r for weight and BMD was 0.26 versus 0.33 for BMC).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2085685     DOI: 10.1016/0169-6009(90)90030-j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Miner        ISSN: 0169-6009


  19 in total

1.  Bone mineral density of the spine and femur in healthy Saudis.

Authors:  M Salleh M Ardawi; Abdulraouf A Maimany; Talal M Bahksh; Hasan A N Nasrat; Waleed A Milaat; Raja M Al-Raddadi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  The effect of bilateral oophorectomy on bone mineral density.

Authors:  Alper Hayirlioglu; Hüsnü Gökaslan; Nurten Andaç
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2006-05-20       Impact factor: 2.631

3.  The impact of clothing style on bone mineral density among women in Turkey.

Authors:  D Alper Hayirlioglu; Husnu Gokaslan; Canan Cimsit; N Ozden Serin
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2007-11-16       Impact factor: 2.631

4.  Volumetric bone mineral density using peripheral quantitative computed tomography in Japanese women.

Authors:  Y Hasegawa; K Kushida; K Yamazaki; T Inoue
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Bone changes in postmenopausal Spanish women.

Authors:  H Rico; E R Hernández; M Revilla; L F Villa; M Alvarez de Buergo; E Cuende
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 6.  Determinants of peak bone mass in young adult women: a review.

Authors:  J J Anderson; F A Tylavsky; L Halioua; J A Metz
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Spine and femur densitometry at the menopause: are both sites necessary in the assessment of the risk of osteoporosis?

Authors:  J M Pouilles; F Tremollieres; C Ribot
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Interpretation of lumbar spine densitometry in women with fractures.

Authors:  S P Nielsen; F Hermansen; O Bärenholdt
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 9.  Bone mineral density and long term exercise. An overview of cross-sectional athlete studies.

Authors:  H Suominen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Radial cortical and trabecular bone densities of men and women standardized with the European Forearm Phantom.

Authors:  J Reeve; H Kröger; J Nijs; J Pearson; D Felsenberg; C Reiners; P Schneider; A Mitchell; P Ruegsegger; C Zander; M Fischer; J Bright; M Henley; M Lunt; J Dequeker
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.