Literature DB >> 16036081

Bone imaging: traditional techniques and their interpretation.

Holger F Boehm1, Thomas M Link.   

Abstract

Patients with osteoporosis have to be diagnosed at an early stage to prevent fractures, the worst complication of this disease. Currently, measurements of bone mineral density (BMD) are used most frequently in the diagnosis of osteoporosis. According to the World Health Organization, osteoporosis is defined on the basis of BMD measurements that are compared with those of a healthy, young, female population. The best established techniques to measure BMD are dual x-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine and proximal femur and quantitative computed tomography of the lumbar spine. Conventional radiographs are not suited to assess bone mass, but they are important in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of osteoporotic fractures. Quantitative ultrasound and structure analysis, based on high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography, are newer techniques in the diagnosis of osteoporosis that also focus on the assessment of bone structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 16036081     DOI: 10.1007/s11914-004-0002-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep        ISSN: 1544-1873            Impact factor:   5.096


  44 in total

Review 1.  [Bone densitometry by dual energy methods].

Authors:  D Felsenberg; W Gowin
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Power spectral analysis of vertebral trabecular bone structure from radiographs: orientation dependence and correlation with bone mineral density and mechanical properties.

Authors:  J Millard; P Augat; T M Link; M Kothari; D C Newitt; H K Genant; S Majumdar
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Epidemiology of vertebral fractures in women.

Authors:  L J Melton; S H Kan; M A Frye; H W Wahner; W M O'Fallon; B L Riggs
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Fractal analysis of trabecular patterns in projection radiographs. An assessment.

Authors:  J Chen; B Zheng; Y H Chang; C C Shaw; J D Towers; D Gur
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 6.016

5.  Prediction of vertebral body compressive fracture using quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  R J McBroom; W C Hayes; W T Edwards; R P Goldberg; A A White
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  A PC program for estimating organ dose and effective dose values in computed tomography.

Authors:  W A Kalender; B Schmidt; M Zankl; M Schmidt
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Quantitative bone mineral assessment at the forearm: a review.

Authors:  P Augat; T Fuerst; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Lateral dual-energy radiography: artifact error from rib and pelvic bone.

Authors:  R C Rupich; M G Griffin; R Pacifici; L V Avioli; N Susman
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  The burden of osteoporosis in California, 1998.

Authors:  W Max; P Sinnot; C Kao; H-Y Sung; D P Rice
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Fractal signature analysis of macroradiographs measures trabecular organization in lumbar vertebrae of postmenopausal women.

Authors:  J C Buckland-Wright; J A Lynch; J Rymer; I Fogelman
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.333

View more
  3 in total

1.  Can bone quality be predicted accurately by Singh index in patients with rheumatoid arthritis?

Authors:  Cemal Bes; Melih Güven; Budak Akman; Evren Fehmi Atay; Emrah Ceviz; Mehmet Soy
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Computed digital absorptiometry for measurement of phalangeal bone mineral mass on a slot-scanning digital radiography system.

Authors:  R Dendere; S P Whiley; T S Douglas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Utilization of DXA Bone Mineral Densitometry in Ontario: An Evidence-Based Analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2006-11-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.