Literature DB >> 8275348

Site of bone density measurement may affect therapy decision.

K Lai1, M Rencken, B L Drinkwater, C H Chesnut.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether bone mineral density (BMD) measurements at the lumbar spine and femoral neck provided comparable information to women planning to use that knowledge to help them make a decision about hormone replacement therapy. Eighty-eight healthy Caucasian women, aged 44-59 and within 0 to 5 years of menopause, participated in the study. BMD measurements were performed at the lumbar spine (L1-L4) and the femoral neck by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Criteria suggested by the National Osteoporosis Foundation were used to categorize women as "at risk" for osteoporosis, bone density more than one standard deviation (SD) below the young adult mean, or as "low risk", bone density at or above this level. The results indicated that 46 women would be classified into the low risk category on the basis of spinal BMD alone. However, 28 of these 46 women would fall into the at risk category when the femoral neck BMD was measured. Sixty-one percent of women informed they were at low risk on the basis of spinal BMD would be considered at risk based on femoral neck BMD. When femoral neck BMD was used as the primary risk indicator, 14% of the women classified as low risk would be at risk if spinal BMD were added. These results suggest that both lumbar spine and proximal femur measurements should be made when women are using bone density measurements as an aid in deciding whether or not to use hormone therapy in their postmenopausal years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8275348     DOI: 10.1007/bf01320905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  16 in total

1.  Assessment of spinal and femoral bone density by dual X-ray absorptiometry: comparison of lunar and hologic instruments.

Authors:  N A Pocock; P N Sambrook; T Nguyen; P Kelly; J Freund; J A Eisman
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  In vitro comparability of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) bone densitometers.

Authors:  M L Rencken; R Murano; B L Drinkwater; C H Chesnut
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 3.  Consensus development conference: prophylaxis and treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Which bone to measure?

Authors:  A G Need; B E Nordin
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Selection of the optimal skeletal site for fracture risk prediction.

Authors:  R D Wasnich; P D Ross; L K Heilbrun; J M Vogel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Long-term prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis by oestrogen. Evidence for an increased bone mass after delayed onset of oestrogen treatment.

Authors:  R Lindsay; D M Hart; J M Aitken; E B MacDonald; J B Anderson; A C Clarke
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1976-05-15       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  A comparison of single and multi-site BMC measurements for assessment of spine fracture probability.

Authors:  R D Wasnich; P D Ross; J W Davis; J M Vogel
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W Browner; J Cauley; K Ensrud; H K Genant; L Palermo; J Scott; T M Vogt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Postmenopausal estrogen therapy and cardiovascular disease. Ten-year follow-up from the nurses' health study.

Authors:  M J Stampfer; G A Colditz; W C Willett; J E Manson; B Rosner; F E Speizer; C H Hennekens
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-09-12       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Bone density of the radius, spine, and proximal femur in osteoporosis.

Authors:  R B Mazess; H Barden; M Ettinger; E Schultz
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis of postmenopausal osteoporosis: reviews in endocrine and metabolic disorders.

Authors:  A T Shields; C H Chesnut
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.514

2.  Guidelines for the clinical utilization of bone mass measurement in the adult population. Society for Clinical Densitometry.

Authors:  P D Miller; S L Bonnick; C Rosen
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 3.  Consensus of an international panel on the clinical utility of bone mass measurements in the detection of low bone mass in the adult population.

Authors:  P D Miller; S L Bonnick; C J Rosen
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Right and left proximal femur analyses: is there a need to do both?

Authors:  S L Bonnick; D L Nichols; C F Sanborn; S G Payne; S M Moen; C J Heiss
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Classification of osteoporosis in the elderly is dependent on site-specific analysis.

Authors:  S L Greenspan; L Maitland-Ramsey; E Myers
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Discrepancies in normative data between Lunar and Hologic DXA systems.

Authors:  K G Faulkner; L A Roberts; M R McClung
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Peak bone mass, bone loss and risk of fracture.

Authors:  C C Johnston; C W Slemenda
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Bilateral comparison of femoral bone density and hip axis length from single and fan beam DXA scans.

Authors:  K G Faulkner; H K Genant; M McClung
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Impact of beverage consumption, age, and site dependency on dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) measurements in perimenopausal women: a prospective study.

Authors:  Huan-Chu Lo; Duen-Pang Kuo; Yen-Lin Chen
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 3.318

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.