Literature DB >> 1955496

A comparison of dual energy radiography measurements at the lumbar spine and proximal femur for the diagnosis of osteoporosis.

M G Griffin1, R C Rupich, L V Avioli, R Pacifici.   

Abstract

In this study we assessed the ability of proximal femur and spine DER measurements to discriminate between control (C) and osteoporotic (OP) subjects as well as the reproducibility of the femoral DER technique. DER measurements of the proximal femur and spine (L2-L4) were obtained in 58 control (unfractured) and 54 osteoporotic (vertebral fractured) women. Linear regression analyses for each site with age suggested that density values from the Ward's triangle region explained the majority of variance due to age in the decline of bone density in both control (r = -0.45; P less than 0.0005) and osteoporotic subjects (r = 0.34; P less than 0.05), with similar findings for the femoral neck in OP subjects (r = -0.30; P less than 0.05). No other femoral site produced a significant correlation with age, and vertebral measurements were the lowest in OP subjects (r = -0.11; P = NS). Cross-sectional rates of bone loss in each region implied that for OP subjects the Ward's triangle and femoral neck regions detected the largest amount of bone loss (0.64% and 0.38%/yr, respectively), while vertebral measurements were again the smallest (0.19%/yr). Results indicated that proximal femur measurements can be obtained with relatively good precision (coefficients of variation ranged from 1.9% for femoral neck to 3.0% for Ward's triangle). Finally, receiver operating characteristic curves revealed that both Ward's triangle and femoral neck densities were able to more successfully discriminate control from osteoporotic subjects than vertebral measurements. These data support the contention that measurement of skeletal sites rich in trabecular bone, such as the femur, are more useful for diagnosing osteoporosis than DER measurements of the lumbar spine. The data also suggest that the femur may be a better site than the lumbar spine for the clinical evaluation of osteoporosis with the DER technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1955496     DOI: 10.1210/jcem-73-6-1164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  13 in total

1.  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the lumbar spine, proximal femur and distal radius in children.

Authors:  H Tsukahara; M Sudo; M Umezaki; M Hiraoka; K Yamamoto; Y Ishii; S Haruki
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1992

2.  The effect of bilateral oophorectomy on bone mineral density.

Authors:  Alper Hayirlioglu; Hüsnü Gökaslan; Nurten Andaç
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2006-05-20       Impact factor: 2.631

3.  Age changes of spine density in posterior-anterior and lateral projections in normal women.

Authors:  R B Mazess; H S Barden; R W Eberle; M D Denton
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Bone density in white Brazilian women: rapid loss at the time around the menopause.

Authors:  V L Szejnfeld; E Atra; E C Baracat; J M Aldrighi; R Civitelli
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Spine and femur density and broadband ultrasound attenuation of the calcaneus in normal Spanish women.

Authors:  S Palacios; C Menéndez; J Calderón; S Rubio
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Spine and femur densitometry at the menopause: are both sites necessary in the assessment of the risk of osteoporosis?

Authors:  J M Pouilles; F Tremollieres; C Ribot
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 7.  When bone mass fails to predict bone failure.

Authors:  S M Ott
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Spine and femur BMD by DXA in patients with varying severity spinal osteoporosis.

Authors:  P J Ryan; G M Blake; R Herd; J Parker; I Fogelman
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Discrimination of total body bone mineral density measured by dexa in vertebral osteoporosis.

Authors:  A Bagur; E Vega; C Mautalen
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.333

10.  The importance of severity of arthrosis for the reliability of bone mineral density measurement in women.

Authors:  Alper Hayirlioglu; Husnu Gokaslan; Canan Cimsit; Begumhan Baysal
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 2.631

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.