Literature DB >> 8504370

Spine and femur densitometry at the menopause: are both sites necessary in the assessment of the risk of osteoporosis?

J M Pouilles1, F Tremollieres, C Ribot.   

Abstract

The aim of our study was to compare the results provided by the measurement of vertebral and femoral bone mineral density (BMD) for assessing the individual risk of osteoporosis as defined by either low BMD and/or rapid bone loss. Vertebral and femoral BMD were measured twice at a mean interval of 21 months in 85 normal, early postmenopausal women who had passed a natural menopause 6 months to 3 years previously. According to the measurement site, 36% (spine), 29% (femoral neck), 35% (Ward's triangle), and 25% (trochanter) fall in the "at risk" category, defined by a BMD value of 1 SD or more below the normal values for premenopausal women. Based on vertebral BMD, 39-48% of the women at risk had a normal femoral BMD. On the other hand, 24-37% of the women classified at risk based on femoral BMD maintained a low risk at the vertebral level. The annual rate of bone loss was significantly greater for the Ward's triangle (-2.7 +/- 3.8%) and femoral neck (-2.1 +/- 2.5%) than for the spine (-1.5 +/- 2.1%) and trochanter (-1.5 +/- 3.4%). There was a significant relationship between the rate of loss measured at the spine and femoral levels (r = 0.34-0.58). Among the 21 women with a rapid vertebral bone loss, 48-67% had a low bone loss at the femoral level and vice versa. The ratio between mean rate of loss and the precision of the measurement sites was greater for the spine (1.6) compared with the femur (1.1-0.71).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8504370     DOI: 10.1007/BF00310196

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  21 in total

1.  Compact and trabecular components of the spine using quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  T Sandor; D Felsenberg; W A Kalender; A Clain; E Brown
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  The effect of age and menopause on bone mineral density of the proximal femur.

Authors:  L R Hedlund; J C Gallagher
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  A comparison of dual energy radiography measurements at the lumbar spine and proximal femur for the diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  M G Griffin; R C Rupich; L V Avioli; R Pacifici
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 5.958

4.  Which bone to measure?

Authors:  A G Need; B E Nordin
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Clinical indications for bone mass measurements. A report from the Scientific Advisory Board of the National Osteoporosis Foundation.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Selection of the optimal skeletal site for fracture risk prediction.

Authors:  R D Wasnich; P D Ross; L K Heilbrun; J M Vogel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Influence of the menopause and aging on spinal density in French women.

Authors:  C Ribot; F Tremollieres; J M Pouilles; J P Louvet; R Guiraud
Journal:  Bone Miner       Date:  1988-10

8.  Screening procedure for women at risk of developing postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  C Christiansen; B J Riis; P Rødbro
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Bone mineral density of the hip measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in normal elderly women and in patients with hip fracture.

Authors:  F Duboeuf; P Braillon; M C Chapuy; P Haond; C Hardouin; M F Meary; P D Delmas; P J Meunier
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Importance of measurement of spongious vertebral bone mineral density in the assessment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  C D Jones; A M Laval-Jeantet; M H Laval-Jeantet; H K Genant
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  11 in total

1.  Performance of four clinical screening tools to select peri- and early postmenopausal women for dual X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  B Rud; J E B Jensen; L Mosekilde; S P Nielsen; J Hilden; B Abrahamsen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-09-30       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  The effect of bilateral oophorectomy on bone mineral density.

Authors:  Alper Hayirlioglu; Hüsnü Gökaslan; Nurten Andaç
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2006-05-20       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 3.  Measurement of bone mineral density.

Authors:  C Hassager; C Christiansen
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Guidelines for the clinical utilization of bone mass measurement in the adult population. Society for Clinical Densitometry.

Authors:  P D Miller; S L Bonnick; C Rosen
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 5.  Consensus of an international panel on the clinical utility of bone mass measurements in the detection of low bone mass in the adult population.

Authors:  P D Miller; S L Bonnick; C J Rosen
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Right and left proximal femur analyses: is there a need to do both?

Authors:  S L Bonnick; D L Nichols; C F Sanborn; S G Payne; S M Moen; C J Heiss
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Discrepancies in normative data between Lunar and Hologic DXA systems.

Authors:  K G Faulkner; L A Roberts; M R McClung
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  The importance of severity of arthrosis for the reliability of bone mineral density measurement in women.

Authors:  Alper Hayirlioglu; Husnu Gokaslan; Canan Cimsit; Begumhan Baysal
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 2.631

9.  Bilateral comparison of femoral bone density and hip axis length from single and fan beam DXA scans.

Authors:  K G Faulkner; H K Genant; M McClung
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 10.  Growth and Age-Related Abnormalities in Cortical Structure and Fracture Risk.

Authors:  Ego Seeman
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab (Seoul)       Date:  2015-09-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.