Literature DB >> 8661948

Consensus of an international panel on the clinical utility of bone mass measurements in the detection of low bone mass in the adult population.

P D Miller1, S L Bonnick, C J Rosen.   

Abstract

Low bone mass, in the asymptomatic patient, predicts future fracture risk as well as high cholesterol or high blood pressure predicts the risk of heart disease or stroke. In patients without fractures, osteoporosis can be diagnosed based on the extent of reduction in bone mass below mean peak bone mass of healthy young individuals. As bone mass decreases, fracture risk increases exponentially. Prevention of the first fracture is a clinical goal. Clinical situations in which an assessment of bone mass and fracture risk affects therapeutic decisions include estrogen deficiency, vertebral abnormalities, radiographic osteopenia, asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism, and longterm corticosteroid therapy. Serial measurements can also be used to monitor the effects of osteoporosis treatment in certain situations. The appropriate technique and skeletal site for bone mass measurements should be chosen based on the patient's circumstances. A clinical interpretation can enhance the value of computer-generated bone mass measurement reports and enhance decision making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8661948     DOI: 10.1007/bf02508636

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  68 in total

1.  Site-matched calcaneal measurements of broad-band ultrasound attenuation and single X-ray absorptiometry: do they measure different skeletal properties?

Authors:  C C Glüer; M Vahlensieck; K G Faulkner; K Engelke; D Black; H K Genant
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 2.  Clinical use of bone densitometry.

Authors:  C C Johnston; C W Slemenda; L J Melton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-04-18       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Results of bone densitometry affect women's decisions about taking measures to prevent fractures.

Authors:  S M Rubin; S R Cummings
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1992-06-15       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 4.  How many women have osteoporosis now?

Authors:  L J Melton
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Ultrasound velocity, through bone predicts incident vertebral deformity.

Authors:  R P Heaney; L V Avioli; C H Chesnut; J Lappe; R R Recker; G H Brandenburger
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Dual X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine: the precision of paired anteroposterior/lateral studies.

Authors:  G M Blake; T Jagathesan; R J Herd; I Fogelman
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  A comparison of single and multi-site BMC measurements for assessment of spine fracture probability.

Authors:  R D Wasnich; P D Ross; J W Davis; J M Vogel
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Site of bone density measurement may affect therapy decision.

Authors:  K Lai; M Rencken; B L Drinkwater; C H Chesnut
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W Browner; J Cauley; K Ensrud; H K Genant; L Palermo; J Scott; T M Vogt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Comparison of speed of sound ultrasound with single photon absorptiometry for determining fracture odds ratios.

Authors:  M R Stegman; R P Heaney; R R Recker
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis of postmenopausal osteoporosis: reviews in endocrine and metabolic disorders.

Authors:  A T Shields; C H Chesnut
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 2.  [Absorptiometry].

Authors:  S Prevrhal
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Measurements of bone mineral density in the lumbar spine and proximal femur using lunar prodigy and the new pencil-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  Dongil Choi; Deog-Yoon Kim; Chung Soo Han; Seonwoo Kim; Hae Sook Bok; Wooseong Huh; Jae-Wook Ko; Sung Hwa Hong
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Effect of weight loss on bone health in overweight/obese postmenopausal breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Adetunji T Toriola; Jingxia Liu; Patricia A Ganz; Graham A Colditz; Lin Yang; Sonya Izadi; Michael J Naughton; Anna L Schwartz; Kathleen Y Wolin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Determination of a standard site for the measurement of bone mineral density of the human calcaneus.

Authors:  B Burston; D S McNally; H D Nicholson
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Lumbar Vertebrae Morphological Analysis and an Additional Approach for Vertebrae Identification in Lumbar Spine DXA Images.

Authors:  Wenmin Guan; Wei Yu; Qiang Lin; Zaizhu Zhang; Guiying Du; Junping Tian; Ying Xu; Evelyn Hsieh
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 2.617

7.  Fusion mass bone quality after uninstrumented spinal fusion in older patients.

Authors:  Thomas Andersen; Finn B Christensen; Bente L Langdahl; Carsten Ernst; Søren Fruensgaard; Jørgen Ostergaard; Jens Langer Andersen; Sten Rasmussen; Bent Niedermann; Kristian Høy; Peter Helmig; Randi Holm; Bent Erling Lindblad; Ebbe Stender Hansen; Niels Egund; Cody Bünger
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Significance of osteoporosis in craniomaxillofacial surgery: a review of the literature.

Authors:  B Hohlweg-Majert; R Schmelzeisen; B M Pfeiffer; E Schneider
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-07-16       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Can peripheral DXA measurements be used to predict fractures in elderly women living in the community?

Authors:  R J Barr; A Adebajo; W D Fraser; J P Halsey; C Kelsey; A Stewart; D M Reid
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-02-10       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Reproducibility of bone mineral density measurement in daily practice.

Authors:  M C Lodder; W F Lems; H J Ader; A E Marthinsen; S C C M van Coeverden; P Lips; J C Netelenbos; B A C Dijkmans; J C Roos
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 19.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.