Literature DB >> 1414499

Site-matched calcaneal measurements of broad-band ultrasound attenuation and single X-ray absorptiometry: do they measure different skeletal properties?

C C Glüer1, M Vahlensieck, K G Faulkner, K Engelke, D Black, H K Genant.   

Abstract

Because of the differences in the interactions of ultrasound and x-ray waves with bone, quantitative ultrasound (QUS) techniques may yield information about skeletal status not accessible by regular bone densitometry (BD) techniques. However, relatively strong correlations have been reported between broad-band ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and several x-ray-based BD methods. We assessed the precision and association of single x-ray absorptiometry (SXA) and BUA of the calcaneus. We examined both BUA and SXA at the calcaneus using special software for matching the regions of interest. An algorithm was derived and applied to correct the observed correlation coefficients for the attenuation effect caused by the precision errors for BUA and SXA. In a group of 33 volunteers covering a wide range of age and calcaneal bone mineral densities, the site-matched and precision-adjusted correlation coefficient between BUA and SXA was r = 0.58, with a standard error of the estimate (SEE) of 14.41 dB/MHz, or 17.08%. For the subgroup of 25 women the correlation was stronger, with r = 0.72 and SEE = 11.53 dB/MHz, or 14.33%. SXA precision was 0.79% for the regular region of interest (ROI) and 1.22% for the site-matched ROI. BUA precision was 2.76% for the entire subject group and 1.63% for women of age 40 or older. The observed correlation coefficient between ultrasound and x-ray based techniques of the order of 0.7 is significant, but it leaves about 50% of the variability unexplained.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1414499     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650070910

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  30 in total

Review 1.  Current methods and advances in bone densitometry.

Authors:  G Guglielmi; C C Gluer; S Majumdar; B A Blunt; H K Genant
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Ultrasound parameters of calcaneal bone density in girls with anorexia nervosa.

Authors:  S Kutílek; M Bayer
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.652

3.  Guidelines for the clinical utilization of bone mass measurement in the adult population. Society for Clinical Densitometry.

Authors:  P D Miller; S L Bonnick; C Rosen
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Ultrasound parametric imaging of the calcaneus: in vivo results with a new device.

Authors:  P Laugier; B Fournier; G Berger
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Influence of marrow on ultrasonic velocity and attenuation in bovine trabecular bone.

Authors:  J M Alves; J T Ryaby; J J Kaufman; F P Magee; R S Siffert
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Assessment of the relationship between broadband ultrasound attenuation and bone mineral density at the calcaneus using BUA imaging and DXA.

Authors:  C Chappard; P Laugier; B Fournier; C Roux; G Berger
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Quantitative ultrasound imaging at the calcaneus using an automatic region of interest.

Authors:  B Fournier; C Chappard; C Roux; G Berger; P Laugier
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Influence of anthropometric parameters on ultrasound measurements of Os calcis.

Authors:  D Hans; A M Schott; M E Arlot; E Sornay; P D Delmas; P J Meunier
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Quantitative ultrasound assessment of bone in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism.

Authors:  S Minisola; R Rosso; A Scarda; M T Pacitti; E Romagnoli; G Mazzuoli
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.333

10.  A precise method for the assessment of tibial ultrasound velocity.

Authors:  J M Orgee; H Foster; E V McCloskey; S Khan; G Coombes; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.