Literature DB >> 20429017

Fusion mass bone quality after uninstrumented spinal fusion in older patients.

Thomas Andersen1, Finn B Christensen, Bente L Langdahl, Carsten Ernst, Søren Fruensgaard, Jørgen Ostergaard, Jens Langer Andersen, Sten Rasmussen, Bent Niedermann, Kristian Høy, Peter Helmig, Randi Holm, Bent Erling Lindblad, Ebbe Stender Hansen, Niels Egund, Cody Bünger.   

Abstract

Older people are at increased risk of non-union after spinal fusion, but little is known about the factors determining the quality of the fusion mass in this patient group. The aim of this study was to investigate fusion mass bone quality after uninstrumented spinal fusion and to evaluate if it could be improved by additional direct current (DC) electrical stimulation. A multicenter RCT compared 40 and 100 μA DC stimulation with a control group of uninstrumented posterolateral fusion in patients older than 60 years. This report comprised 80 patients who underwent DEXA scanning at the 1 year follow-up. The study population consisted of 29 men with a mean age of 72 years (range 62-85) and 51 women with a mean age of 72 years (range 61-84). All patients underwent DEXA scanning of their fusion mass. Fusion rate was assessed at the 2 year follow-up using thin slice CT scanning. DC electrical stimulation did not improve fusion mass bone quality. Smokers had lower fusion mass BMD (0.447 g/cm(2)) compared to non-smokers (0.517 g/cm(2)) (P = 0.086). Women had lower fusion mass BMD (0.460 g/cm(2)) compared to men (0.552 g/cm(2)) (P = 0.057). Using linear regression, fusion mass bone quality, measured as BMD, was significantly influenced by gender, age of the patient, bone density of the remaining part of the lumbar spine, amount of bone graft applied and smoking. Fusion rates in this cohort was 34% in the control group and 33 and 43% in the 40 and 100 μA groups, respectively (not significant). Patients classified as fused after 2 years had significant higher fusion mass BMD at 1 year (0.592 vs. 0.466 g/cm(2), P = 0.0001). Fusion mass bone quality in older patients depends on several factors. Special attention should be given to women with manifest or borderline osteoporosis. Furthermore, bone graft materials with inductive potential might be considered for this patient population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20429017      PMCID: PMC2997208          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-010-1373-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  41 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy and reliability of fine-cut CT scans with reconstructions to determine the status of an instrumented posterolateral fusion with surgical exploration as reference standard.

Authors:  Leah Y Carreon; Mladen Djurasovic; Steven D Glassman; Philip Sailer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Osteoporosis: gender differences and similarities.

Authors:  S Khosla; L J Melton; B L Riggs
Journal:  Lupus       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.911

3.  Efficacy of implanted bone growth stimulation in instrumented lumbosacral spinal fusion.

Authors:  A Rogozinski; C Rogozinski
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Surgical outcomes of posterior lumbar interbody fusion in elderly patients.

Authors:  Shinya Okuda; Takenori Oda; Akira Miyauchi; Takamitsu Haku; Tomio Yamamoto; Motoki Iwasaki
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Volumetric change of the graft bone after intertransverse fusion.

Authors:  K W Kim; K Y Ha; M S Moon; Y S Kim; S Y Kwon; Y K Woo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 6.  Fracture healing in osteoporotic fractures: is it really different? A basic science perspective.

Authors:  Peter Giannoudis; Christopher Tzioupis; Talal Almalki; Richard Buckley
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.586

7.  Osteoporosis influences the late period of fracture healing in a rat model prepared by ovariectomy and low calcium diet.

Authors:  T Kubo; T Shiga; J Hashimoto; M Yoshioka; H Honjo; M Urabe; I Kitajima; I Semba; Y Hirasawa
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.292

Review 8.  Surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylosis: updated Cochrane Review.

Authors:  J N Alastair Gibson; Gordon Waddell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 9.  Mechanics and mechano-biology of fracture healing in normal and osteoporotic bone.

Authors:  Peter Augat; Ulrich Simon; Astrid Liedert; Lutz Claes
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Changes of microstructure and mineralized tissue in the middle and late phase of osteoporotic fracture healing in rats.

Authors:  Ying-jie Hao; Hao Yingjie; Ge Zhang; Zhang Ge; Yi-sheng Wang; Wang Yisheng; Ling Qin; Qin Ling; W Y Hung; Kwoksui Leung; Leung Kwoksui; Fu-xing Pei; Pei Fuxing
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  12 in total

1.  Editorial on "Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using polyetheretherketone oblique cages with and without a titanium coating: a randomised clinical pilot study".

Authors:  Kristian Høy; Haisheng Li
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-06

Review 2.  Electrical stimulation-based bone fracture treatment, if it works so well why do not more surgeons use it?

Authors:  Mit Balvantray Bhavsar; Zhihua Han; Thomas DeCoster; Liudmila Leppik; Karla Mychellyne Costa Oliveira; John H Barker
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 3.693

3.  An effect comparison of teriparatide and bisphosphonate on posterior lumbar interbody fusion in patients with osteoporosis: a prospective cohort study and preliminary data.

Authors:  Pyung Goo Cho; Gyu Yeul Ji; Dong Ah Shin; Yoon Ha; Do Heum Yoon; Keung Nyun Kim
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Factors important in bone union after posterior lumbar interbody fusion using the cortical bone trajectory technique.

Authors:  Yoshihide Yanai; Keitaro Matsukawa; Takashi Kato; Yoshiyuki Yato
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12

5.  A Novel Bmal1 Mutant Mouse Reveals Essential Roles of the C-Terminal Domain on Circadian Rhythms.

Authors:  Noheon Park; Hee-Dae Kim; Solmi Cheon; Hansang Row; Jiyeon Lee; Dong-Hee Han; Sehyung Cho; Kyungjin Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Can Pixel Value Ratio be Used in the Assessment of Ceramic Bone Substitute Incorporation? Observations from a Pilot Study.

Authors:  Balasubramanian Balakumar; Anitha Jasper; Roshan S Livingstone; Sangeet Gangadharan; Sridhar Gibikote; Vrisha Madhuri
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2017-11-17

7.  Denosumab alleviates intervertebral disc degeneration adjacent to lumbar fusion by inhibiting endplate osteochondral remodeling and vertebral osteoporosis in ovariectomized rats.

Authors:  Qi Sun; Fa-Ming Tian; Fang Liu; Jia-Kang Fang; Yun-Peng Hu; Qiang-Qiang Lian; Zhuang Zhou; Liu Zhang
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 5.156

8.  Interbody Fusion in Low Grade Lumbar Spondylolsithesis: Clinical Outcome Does Not Correalte with Slip Reduction and Neural Foraminal Dimension.

Authors:  Ujjwal K Debnath; Atanu Chatterjee; Jeffrey R McConnell; Deepak K Jha; Tapas Chakraburtty
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2016-04-15

9.  Ovariectomy-Induced Osteoporosis Does Not Impact Fusion Rates in a Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2-Dependent Rat Posterolateral Arthrodesis Model.

Authors:  Jason H Ghodasra; Michael S Nickoli; Sohaib Z Hashmi; John T Nelson; Marco Mendoza; Joseph D Nicolas; Sharath S Bellary; Kevin Sonn; Amruta Ashtekar; Christian J Park; Jacob Babu; Chawon Yun; Anjan Ghosh; Abhishek Kannan; Stuart R Stock; Wellington K Hsu; Erin L Hsu
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2015-06-24

10.  LIPUS promotes spinal fusion coupling proliferation of type H microvessels in bone.

Authors:  Ximing Xu; Fei Wang; Yahong Yang; Xiaoyi Zhou; Yajun Cheng; Xianzhao Wei; Ming Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.