Literature DB >> 1586110

Results of bone densitometry affect women's decisions about taking measures to prevent fractures.

S M Rubin1, S R Cummings.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe how the results of bone densitometry affect women's decisions about measures to prevent fractures and to determine whether labeling women as having below-normal bone density has adverse effects.
DESIGN: Mail survey of a random sample of women.
SETTING: Four community hospitals in the San Francisco Bay area. PATIENTS: A total of 261 women (response rate, 81.3%) who had undergone bone densitometry. MEASUREMENTS: Bone densitometry and self-report of changes in attitude and behaviors.
RESULTS: Fifty-three percent of the women reported that their first bone density measurements were below normal, and 44% said that they were diagnosed as having osteoporosis on the basis of their test results. Women who reported that their bone density measurements were below normal were much more likely than women with normal results to begin some type of measure to prevent fractures (94% compared with 56%; P less than 0.01), to start hormone therapy (38% compared with 8%; P less than 0.01), and to take precautions to avoid falling (50% compared with 9%; P less than 0.01). Women reporting low bone density, however, also became more fearful of falling (38% compared with 2%; P less than 0.01) and limited their activities to avoid falling (24% compared with 2%; P less than 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of bone densitometry substantially influence women's decisions about beginning estrogen replacement therapy and other preventive measures for osteoporotic fractures. The potential effects of labeling a woman as having below-normal bone density need to be considered before densitometry is widely used for unselective screening of women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1586110     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-116-12-990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  31 in total

1.  Influence of bone densitometry results on the treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  N S Fitt; S L Mitchell; A Cranney; K Gulenchyn; M Huang; P Tugwell
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-03-20       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Impact of bone turnover markers and/or educational information on persistence to oral bisphosphonate therapy: a community setting-based trial.

Authors:  S L Silverman; K Nasser; S Nattrass; B Drinkwater
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Women's decisions about hormone replacement therapy after education and bone densitometry.

Authors:  A Papaioannou; W Parkinson; J Adachi; A O'Connor; E E Jolly; P Tugwell; M Bédard
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-11-17       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Osteoporosis and bone densitometry: does the emperor have clothes?

Authors:  B C Lentle
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-11-17       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Guidelines for the clinical utilization of bone mass measurement in the adult population. Society for Clinical Densitometry.

Authors:  P D Miller; S L Bonnick; C Rosen
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Not the Last Word: Pre-arthritis Syndrome.

Authors:  Joseph Bernstein
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Factors related to the use of bone densitometry: survey responses of 494 primary care physicians in New England.

Authors:  D H Solomon; M T Connelly; C J Rosen; B Dawson-Hughes; D P Kiel; S L Greenspan; E S Leib; M Holick; A H Miguel; J S Finkelstein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-03-14       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  How are family physicians managing osteoporosis? Qualitative study of their experiences and educational needs.

Authors:  Susan B Jaglal; June Carroll; Gillian Hawker; Warren J McIsaac; Liisa Jaakkimainen; Suzanne M Cadarette; Cathy Cameron; Dave Davis
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  Direct-to-participant feedback and awareness of bone mineral density testing results in a population-based sample of mid-aged Canadians.

Authors:  E Kingwell; J C Prior; P A Ratner; S M Kennedy
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Predictors of oral bisphosphonate prescriptions in post-menopausal women with osteoporosis in a real-world setting in the USA.

Authors:  C Asche; R Nelson; C McAdam-Marx; M Jhaveri; X Ye
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.