Literature DB >> 7785453

Ultrasound velocity, through bone predicts incident vertebral deformity.

R P Heaney1, L V Avioli, C H Chesnut, J Lappe, R R Recker, G H Brandenburger.   

Abstract

We followed 130 postmenopausal women without evidence of vertebral deformity by lateral spine radiographs on entry into study for 2 years, and repeat spine radiographs were taken at the end of that time. Incident deformities occurring within this 2 year period were detected by two methods, a level-specific radiogrammetric approach and visual inspection by skilled clinicians. Fourteen incident deformities were detected by the radiogrammetric method, and 19 by the clinicians. Ultrasound transmission velocity was measured at the patella in each subject on entry. Values for ultrasound velocity were significantly correlated with incident fracture occurrence, with individuals having velocity values more than one standard deviation below the mean for the group exhibiting from 3.3 to 4.6 times the probability of incident fracture as individuals with velocity values more than one standard deviation above the mean. Thus, low values for ultrasound transmission velocity at the patella detect yet-unexpressed bony fragility at the spine and predict future fracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7785453     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650100302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  11 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic value of ultrasound analysis and bone densitometry as predictors of vertebral deformity in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  S Gonnelli; C Cepollaro; D Agnusdei; R Palmieri; S Rossi; C Gennari
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  The vertebral fracture cascade in osteoporosis: a review of aetiopathogenesis.

Authors:  A M Briggs; A M Greig; J D Wark
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-01-06       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Ultrasound parametric imaging of the calcaneus: in vivo results with a new device.

Authors:  P Laugier; B Fournier; G Berger
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Calcaneal ultrasound attenuation in older African-American and Caucasian-American women.

Authors:  J A Cauley; M E Danielson; E W Gregg; M T Vogt; J Zmuda; D C Bauer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  The epidemiology of quantitative ultrasound: a review of the relationships with bone mass, osteoporosis and fracture risk.

Authors:  E W Gregg; A M Kriska; L M Salamone; M M Roberts; S J Anderson; R E Ferrell; L H Kuller; J A Cauley
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  The role of ultrasound in the assessment of osteoporosis: a review.

Authors:  C F Njeh; C M Boivin; C M Langton
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  The effect of ankle oedema on bone ultrasound assessment at the heel.

Authors:  A Johansen; M D Stone
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Ultrasound parameters in osteoporotic patients treated with salmon calcitonin: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  S Gonnelli; C Cepollaro; C Pondrelli; S Martini; S Rossi; C Gennari
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Ultrasound, densitometry, and extraskeletal appendicular fracture risk factors: a cross-sectional report on the Saunders County Bone Quality Study.

Authors:  D Travers-Gustafson; M R Stegman; R P Heaney; R R Recker
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.333

10.  A cross-sectional survey of factors influencing bone mass in junior high school students.

Authors:  Yuka Tamura; Isao Saito; Yasuhiko Asada; Taro Kishida; Masamitsu Yamaizumi; Tadahiro Kato
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 3.674

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.