Literature DB >> 8148683

Clinical course and prognostic factors in acute low back pain: an inception cohort study in primary care practice.

J Coste1, G Delecoeuillerie, A Cohen de Lara, J M Le Parc, J B Paolaggi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the natural course of recent acute low back pain in terms of both morbidity (pain, disability) and absenteeism from work and to evaluate the prognostic factors for these outcomes.
DESIGN: Inception cohort study.
SETTING: Primary care. PATIENTS: 103 patients with acute localised non-specific back pain lasting less than 72 hours. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Complete recovery (disappearance of both pain and disability) and return to work.
RESULTS: 90% of patients recovered within two weeks and only two developed chronic low back pain. Only 49 of 100 patients for whom data were available had bed rest and 40% of 75 employed patients lost no time from work. Proportional hazards regression analysis showed that previous chronic episodes of low back pain, initial disability level, initial pain worse when standing, initial pain worse when lying, and compensation status were significantly associated with delayed episode recovery. These factors were also related to absenteeism from work. Absenteeism from work was also influenced by job satisfaction and gender.
CONCLUSIONS: The recovery rate from acute low back pain was much higher than reported in other studies. Those studies, however, did not investigate groups of patients enrolled shortly after the onset of symptoms and often mixed acute low back pain patients with patients with exacerbations of chronic pain or sciatica. Several sociodemographic and clinical factors were of prognostic value in acute low back pain. Factors which influenced the outcome in terms of episode recovery (mainly physical severity factors) were only partly predictive of absenteeism from work. Time off work and return to work depended more on sociodemographic and job related influences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8148683      PMCID: PMC2539597          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.308.6928.577

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  25 in total

1.  Clinical and psychological diversity of non-specific low-back pain. A new approach towards the classification of clinical subgroups.

Authors:  J Coste; A Spira; P Ducimetiere; J B Paolaggi
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Observer variability in the interpretation of lumbar spine radiographs.

Authors:  R A Deyo; L M McNiesh; R O Cone
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1985-09

3.  A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain.

Authors:  M Roland; R Morris
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Prognostic indicators for acute low-back pain.

Authors:  M N Goertz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 5.  Advances in low-back pain.

Authors:  A L Nachemson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Measuring physical and psychosocial function in patients with low-back pain.

Authors:  R A Deyo; A K Diehl
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Low back pain in men receiving workmen's compensation.

Authors:  A W White
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1966-07-09       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Organic status, psychological disturbance, and pain report characteristics in low-back-pain patients on compensation.

Authors:  F Leavitt; D C Garron; T W McNeill; W W Whisler
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1982 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Psychosocial predictors of disability in patients with low back pain.

Authors:  R A Deyo; A K Diehl
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 4.666

10.  How many days of bed rest for acute low back pain? A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  R A Deyo; A K Diehl; M Rosenthal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-10-23       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  74 in total

Review 1.  Occupational psychological factors increase the risk for back pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  S J Linton
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2001-03

2.  Early prognostic factors for duration on temporary total benefits in the first year among workers with compensated occupational soft tissue injuries.

Authors:  S Hogg-Johnson; D C Cole
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 3.  Readiness for return to work following injury or illness: conceptualizing the interpersonal impact of health care, workplace, and insurance factors.

Authors:  Renée-Louise Franche; Niklas Krause
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2002-12

Review 4.  Psychosocial factors at work in relation to low back pain and consequences of low back pain; a systematic, critical review of prospective cohort studies.

Authors:  J Hartvigsen; S Lings; C Leboeuf-Yde; L Bakketeig
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 5.  [Patients with low back pain. Psychosocial work-related factors and return to work - a literature review].

Authors:  M Bethge
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  The prognostic ability of the STarT Back Tool was affected by episode duration.

Authors:  Lars Morso; Alice Kongsted; Lise Hestbaek; Peter Kent
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Prevalence of low back pain in the community: implications for service provision in Bradford, UK.

Authors:  M Hillman; A Wright; G Rajaratnam; A Tennant; M A Chamberlain
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 8.  Prognostic factors for duration of sick leave in patients sick listed with acute low back pain: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  I A Steenstra; J H Verbeek; M W Heymans; P M Bongers
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.402

9.  Prognostic factors for recovery from postpartum pelvic girdle pain.

Authors:  Nina K Vøllestad; Britt Stuge
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  A study on factors affecting low back pain and safety and efficacy of NSAIDs in acute low back pain in a tertiary care hospital of Western Nepal.

Authors:  Srijana Bhattarai; Himal Paudel Chhetri; Kadir Alam; Pabin Thapa
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-12-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.