Literature DB >> 8935469

Prevalence of low back pain in the community: implications for service provision in Bradford, UK.

M Hillman1, A Wright, G Rajaratnam, A Tennant, M A Chamberlain.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To assist a purchasing district in the planning of services for low back pain by assessing the prevalence of symptoms and the current involvement of primary, secondary, and complementary care in the treatment of low back pain. In the light of these findings, to assess further the potential impact of a new system of open access to physical therapy, as recommended by the British Clinical Standards Advisory Group (CSAG).
DESIGN: A two-stage cross sectional survey approach using postal questionnaires.
SUBJECTS: Altogether 1437 men and 1747 women aged 25-64 years, randomly selected from the family health services association register in Bradford. MAIN
RESULTS: An annual incidence of 4.7% for low back pain was found, with lifetime, 12 month period, and point prevalences of 59%, 39%, and 19% respectively. Over a one year period, 50.3% of episodes were acute (< 2 weeks), 21% were subacute (2 weeks-3 months), and 26% were chronic (over 3 months) in duration. Altogether 17.8% of the population in this age range experienced referred pain, numbness, or tingling, and 6.4% took time off work as a result of low back pain. In the same year, 20% of the population in the same age range consulted no-one about their pain, 13.7% were treated at the primary care level, 4% received secondary care, and 3% visited a complementary therapist. One fifth of those who did not consult a professional experienced severe pain during episodes. Prevalence estimates indicate that an emphasis on early intervention and primary care management of simple low back pain as recommended by the CSAG could generate a 131% surge in demand for physical therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: Local prevalence estimates may allow purchasers to estimate the potential effects of a shift in management policy for low back pain and to highlight areas of unmet need in terms of resources and patient education.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8935469      PMCID: PMC1060294          DOI: 10.1136/jech.50.3.347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  14 in total

1.  Occupational rheumatology: are we using the wrong model?

Authors:  P S Helliwell
Journal:  Br J Rheumatol       Date:  1992-02

2.  A confidence interval approach to investigating non-response bias and monitoring response to postal questionnaires.

Authors:  A Tennant; E M Badley
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 3.  1987 Volvo award in clinical sciences. A new clinical model for the treatment of low-back pain.

Authors:  G Waddell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Comparative validity of the sickness impact profile and shorter scales for functional assessment in low-back pain.

Authors:  R A Deyo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Work for all. For those with low back pain as well.

Authors:  A Nachemson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain.

Authors:  M Roland; R Morris
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Symptoms and signs: physical disease or illness behaviour?

Authors:  G Waddell; M Bircher; D Finlayson; C J Main
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-09-22

8.  Clinical assessment of lumbar impairment.

Authors:  G Waddell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Clinical course and prognostic factors in acute low back pain: an inception cohort study in primary care practice.

Authors:  J Coste; G Delecoeuillerie; A Cohen de Lara; J M Le Parc; J B Paolaggi
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-02-26

10.  Reproducibility of histories of low-back pain obtained by self-administered questionnaire.

Authors:  K Walsh; D Coggon
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  33 in total

1.  Individual and occupational determinants of low back pain according to various definitions of low back pain.

Authors:  A Ozguler; A Leclerc; M F Landre; F Pietri-Taleb; I Niedhammer
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Models of integrating physical therapists into family health teams in ontario, Canada: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Cheryl A Cott; Shilpa Mandoda; Michel D Landry
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 1.037

3.  Prevalence and risk factors of low back pain among nurses in a typical Nigerian hospital.

Authors:  L Sikiru; S Hanifa
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 0.927

4.  Relations between occupational, psychosocial and individual factors and three different categories of back disorder among supermarket workers.

Authors:  Francesco S Violante; Francesca Graziosi; Roberta Bonfiglioli; Stefania Curti; Stefano Mattioli
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 5.  Self-management of chronic low back pain and osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Stephen May
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 20.543

6.  Over-indebtedness and its association with the prevalence of back pain.

Authors:  Elke B Ochsmann; Heiko Rueger; Stephan Letzel; Hans Drexler; Eva Muenster
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-12-06       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Tuning of automatic exposure control strength in lumbar spine CT.

Authors:  A D'Hondt; A Cornil; P Bohy; V De Maertelaer; P A Gevenois; D Tack
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 8.  Effectiveness of preventive back educational interventions for low back pain: a critical review of randomized controlled clinical trials.

Authors:  C Demoulin; M Marty; S Genevay; M Vanderthommen; G Mahieu; Y Henrotin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  The comparative prognostic value of directional preference and centralization: a useful tool for front-line clinicians?

Authors:  Audrey Long; Stephen May; Tak Fung
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2008

10.  Positive relationship between bone mineral density and low back pain in middle-aged women.

Authors:  Takashi Manabe; Shin-ichiro Takasugi; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-10-16       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.