Literature DB >> 2945109

How many days of bed rest for acute low back pain? A randomized clinical trial.

R A Deyo, A K Diehl, M Rosenthal.   

Abstract

Bed rest is usually recommended for acute low back pain. Although the optimal duration of bed rest is uncertain, a given prescription may directly affect the number of days lost from work or other activities. In a randomized trial, we compared the consequences of recommending two days of bed rest (Group I) with those of recommending seven days (Group II). The subjects were 203 walk-in patients with mechanical low back pain; 78 percent had acute pain (less than or equal to 30 days), and none had marked neurologic deficits. Follow-up data were obtained at three weeks (93 percent) and three months (88 percent). Although compliance with the recommendation of bed rest was variable, patients randomly assigned to Group I missed 45 percent fewer days of work than those assigned to Group II (3.1 vs. 5.6 days, P = 0.01), and no differences were observed in other functional, physiologic, or perceived outcomes. For many patients without neuromotor deficits, clinicians may be able to recommend two days of bed rest rather than longer periods, without any perceptible difference in clinical outcome. If widely applied, this policy might substantially reduce absenteeism from work and the resulting indirect costs of low back pain for both patients and employers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 2945109     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198610233151705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  41 in total

Review 1.  Determining clinically important differences in health status measures: a general approach with illustration to the Health Utilities Index Mark II.

Authors:  G Samsa; D Edelman; M L Rothman; G R Williams; J Lipscomb; D Matchar
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Routine primary care management of acute low back pain: adherence to clinical guidelines.

Authors:  Violeta González-Urzelai; Loreto Palacio-Elua; Josefina López-de-Munain
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-11-06       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Cervical spine: degenerative conditions.

Authors:  Andrew G Todd
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2011-12

4.  Impact of litigation on quality of life outcomes in patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  C Blake; M Garrett
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1997 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 5.  Measuring quality of life in clinical trials: a taxonomy and review.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; S J Veldhuyzen Van Zanten; D H Feeny; D L Patrick
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1989-06-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 6.  Outcome of non-invasive treatment modalities on back pain: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Maurits W van Tulder; Bart Koes; Antti Malmivaara
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Management patterns in acute low back pain: the role of physical therapy.

Authors:  Alfred Campbell Gellhorn; Leighton Chan; Brook Martin; Janna Friedly
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Early return to work following an aggressive rehabilitation program initiated one day after spine surgery.

Authors:  P O Sjolinder; D F Nota
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1994-12

9.  How many days of bed rest for acute low back pain? Objective assessment of trunk function.

Authors:  M Szpalski; J P Hayez
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  Clinical approaches to low back pain. Part 2. Management, sequelae, and disability and compensation.

Authors:  R W Teasell; K White
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.275

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.