Literature DB >> 19238458

Prognostic factors for recovery from postpartum pelvic girdle pain.

Nina K Vøllestad1, Britt Stuge.   

Abstract

Pelvic girdle pain (PGP) has a high incidence during pregnancy and in some women pain will persist for years. Most studies have used pain as the outcome measure, and little attention is given to functioning or disability. A better understanding of prognostic factors for recovery seems important for clinical care and treatment. The aim of the present paper was to identify prognostic factors for recovery from postpartum PGP and disability, and to determine the impacts of prognostic factors when pain intensity and disability are used as outcome measures. Seventy-eight women with diagnosed PGP were included 6-16 weeks postpartum. Possible prognostic factors were obtained through clinical tests and questionnaires at baseline. The clinical tests were posterior pelvic pain provocation (P4) test, active straight leg raise (ASLR) test and pain provocation of long dorsal sacroiliac ligament (LDL). One year postpartum outcome measures were obtained by Oswestry disability index (ODI ver 2.0) and worst evening pain (VAS 0-100). Multiple linear regression and logistic regression analyses were used to identify significant prognostic factors. At baseline 60% believed they would recover and 40% were uncertain or believed they would not recover. Fifty per cent had a history of low back pain (LBP), and 20% had high emotional distress (HSCL25-item > or =1.75). About 75% had positive LDL and P4 at both sides and 24% had pain located to all three pelvic joints. Forty per cent had ASLR scores of at least 4 (sum score range 0-10). Multivariate analyses showed consistently that ASLR and belief in improvement were statistical significant predictors for both disability and pain as outcome measures. ASLR score <4 predicted 10 points lower ODI and 19 points lower evening pain compared with having ASLR score of at least 4. Pain location was a statistical significant predictor in only one analysis. History of LBP or high psychological distress was not prognostic for recovery. ASLR test and belief in improvement are predictors of clinical significance in women having PGP postpartum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19238458      PMCID: PMC3234007          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-0911-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  33 in total

Review 1.  The Oswestry Disability Index.

Authors:  J C Fairbank; P B Pynsent
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited.

Authors:  Albert Bandura; Edwin A Locke
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2003-02

3.  Factors associated with back pain symptoms in pregnancy and the persistence of pain 2 years after pregnancy.

Authors:  W W K To; M W N Wong
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.636

4.  Validity of the active straight leg raise test for measuring disease severity in patients with posterior pelvic pain after pregnancy.

Authors:  Jan M A Mens; Andry Vleeming; Chris J Snijders; Bart W Koes; Henk J Stam
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Incidence of four syndromes of pregnancy-related pelvic joint pain.

Authors:  Hanne B Albert; Mona Godskesen; Jes G Westergaard
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Reliability and validity of the active straight leg raise test in posterior pelvic pain since pregnancy.

Authors:  J M Mens; A Vleeming; C J Snijders; B W Koes; H J Stam
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  The active straight leg raising test and mobility of the pelvic joints.

Authors:  J M Mens; A Vleeming; C J Snijders; H J Stam; A Z Ginai
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Prognosis in four syndromes of pregnancy-related pelvic pain.

Authors:  H Albert; M Godskesen; J Westergaard
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.636

9.  Possible role of the long dorsal sacroiliac ligament in women with peripartum pelvic pain.

Authors:  Andry Vleeming; Haitze J de Vries; Jan M A Mens; Jan-Paul van Wingerden
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 10.  European guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic girdle pain.

Authors:  Andry Vleeming; Hanne B Albert; Hans Christian Ostgaard; Bengt Sturesson; Britt Stuge
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  12 in total

1.  Predictors for long-term disability in women with persistent postpartum pelvic girdle pain.

Authors:  Jenny Sjödahl; Annelie Gutke; Birgitta Öberg
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The use of "stabilization exercises" to affect neuromuscular control in the lumbopelvic region: a narrative review.

Authors:  Paul Bruno
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2014-06

3.  Pelvic girdle pain 3-6 months after delivery in an unselected cohort of Norwegian women.

Authors:  Anne Marie Gausel; Inger Kjærmann; Stefan Malmqvist; Ingvild Dalen; Jan Petter Larsen; Inger Økland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Pregnancy-related low back pain.

Authors:  P Katonis; A Kampouroglou; A Aggelopoulos; K Kakavelakis; S Lykoudis; A Makrigiannakis; K Alpantaki
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 0.471

5.  Pelvic girdle pain--associations between risk factors in early pregnancy and disability or pain intensity in late pregnancy: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Hilde Stendal Robinson; Marit B Veierød; Anne Marit Mengshoel; Nina K Vøllestad
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Pregnancy-related severe pelvic girdle pain caused by unilateral noninfectious sacroiliitis. A case report and literature review.

Authors:  D Mahovic; N Laktasic-Zerjavic; K I Tudor; I Mercep; M Prutki; B Anic
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.372

7.  Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of a Chinese version of the pelvic girdle questionnaire.

Authors:  Hui Cong; Heng Liu; Yin Sun; Jinsong Gao; Juntao Liu; Liangkun Ma; Britt Stuge; Lixia Chen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 8.  Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain: an update.

Authors:  Nikolaos K Kanakaris; Craig S Roberts; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 8.775

9.  Predictors and consequences of long-term pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain: a longitudinal follow-up study.

Authors:  Helen Elden; Annelie Gutke; Gunilla Kjellby-Wendt; Monika Fagevik-Olsen; Hans-Christian Ostgaard
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 10.  A systematic review of randomised controlled trials on the effectiveness of exercise programs on Lumbo Pelvic Pain among postnatal women.

Authors:  Pei-Ching Tseng; Shuby Puthussery; Yannis Pappas; Meei-Ling Gau
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.