Literature DB >> 16299094

Prognostic factors for duration of sick leave in patients sick listed with acute low back pain: a systematic review of the literature.

I A Steenstra1, J H Verbeek, M W Heymans, P M Bongers.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The percentages of patients with acute low back pain (LBP) that go on to a chronic state varies between studies from 2% to 34%. In some of these cases low back pain leads to great costs. AIMS: To evaluate the evidence for prognostic factors for return to work among workers sick listed with acute LBP.
METHODS: Systematic literature search with a quality assessment of studies, assessment of levels of evidence for all factors, and pooling of effect sizes.
RESULTS: Inclusion of studies in the review was restricted to inception cohort studies of workers with LBP on sick leave for less than six weeks, with the outcome measured in absolute terms, relative terms, survival curve, or duration of sick leave. Of the studies, 18 publications (14 cohorts) fulfilled all inclusion criteria. One low quality study, four moderate quality studies, and nine high quality studies were identified; 79 prognostic factors were studied and grouped in eight categories for which the evidence was assessed.
CONCLUSIONS: Specific LBP, higher disability levels, older age, female gender, more social dysfunction and more social isolation, heavier work, and receiving higher compensation were identified as predictors for a longer duration of sick leave. A history of LBP, job satisfaction, educational level, marital status, number of dependants, smoking, working more than 8 hour shifts, occupation, and size of industry or company do not influence duration of sick leave due to LBP. Many different constructs were measured to identify psychosocial predictors of long term sick leave, which made it impossible to determine the role of these factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16299094      PMCID: PMC1740930          DOI: 10.1136/oem.2004.015842

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  45 in total

1.  Method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group for Spinal Disorders.

Authors:  M W van Tulder; W J Assendelft; B W Koes; L M Bouter
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Early predictors of outcome.

Authors:  M Nordin; M L Skovron; R Hiebert; S Weiser; P M Brisson; M Campello; M Crane; S Lewis
Journal:  Bull Hosp Jt Dis       Date:  1996

3.  A random-effects regression model for meta-analysis.

Authors:  C S Berkey; D C Hoaglin; F Mosteller; G A Colditz
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1995-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  The dominant role of psychosocial risk factors in the development of chronic low back pain disability.

Authors:  R J Gatchel; P B Polatin; T G Mayer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  A population-based, randomized clinical trial on back pain management.

Authors:  P Loisel; L Abenhaim; P Durand; J M Esdaile; S Suissa; L Gosselin; R Simard; J Turcotte; J Lemaire
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Back school in a first episode of compensated acute low back pain: a clinical trial to assess efficacy and prevent relapse.

Authors:  R Leclaire; J M Esdaile; S Suissa; M Rossignol; R Proulx; M Dupuis
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  The prognostic consequences in the making of the initial medical diagnosis of work-related back injuries.

Authors:  L Abenhaim; M Rossignol; D Gobeille; Y Bonvalot; P Fines; S Scott
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  A cost-of-illness study of back pain in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Maurits W van Tulder; Bart W Koes; Lex M Bouter
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  Predicting outcome of chronic back pain using clinical predictors of psychopathology: a prospective analysis.

Authors:  R J Gatchel; P B Polatin; R K Kinney
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.267

Review 10.  Acute low back pain: systematic review of its prognosis.

Authors:  Liset H M Pengel; Robert D Herbert; Chris G Maher; Kathryn M Refshauge
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-08-09
View more
  143 in total

1.  Comparing current definitions of return to work: a measurement approach.

Authors:  I A Steenstra; H Lee; E M M de Vroome; J W Busse; S J Hogg-Johnson
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2012-09

2.  Functional recovery following musculoskeletal injury in hospital workers.

Authors:  M Gillen; M G Cisternas; I H Yen; L Swig; R Rugulies; J Frank; P D Blanc
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 1.611

Review 3.  The relationship between physical activity and low back pain outcomes: a systematic review of observational studies.

Authors:  Paul Hendrick; S Milosavljevic; L Hale; D A Hurley; S McDonough; B Ryan; G D Baxter
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Distressed, immobilized, or lacking employer support? A sub-classification of acute work-related low back pain.

Authors:  Silje Endresen Reme; William S Shaw; Ivan A Steenstra; Mary Jane Woiszwillo; Glenn Pransky; Steven J Linton
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2012-12

5.  Early predictors of occupational back reinjury: results from a prospective study of workers in Washington State.

Authors:  Benjamin J Keeney; Judith A Turner; Deborah Fulton-Kehoe; Thomas M Wickizer; Kwun Chuen Gary Chan; Gary M Franklin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 6.  [Patients with low back pain. Psychosocial work-related factors and return to work - a literature review].

Authors:  M Bethge
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 7.  Epidemiology of work related neck and upper limb problems: psychosocial and personal risk factors (part I) and effective interventions from a bio behavioural perspective (part II).

Authors:  P M Bongers; S Ijmker; S van den Heuvel; B M Blatter
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-09

8.  Workers' beliefs and expectations affect return to work over 12 months.

Authors:  Martijn W Heymans; Henrica C W de Vet; Dirk L Knol; Paulien M Bongers; Bart W Koes; Willem van Mechelen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-12

Review 9.  Reducing sickness absence from work due to low back pain: how well do intervention strategies match modifiable risk factors?

Authors:  William S Shaw; Steven J Linton; Glenn Pransky
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-12

10.  Exploring the contribution of patient-reported and clinician based variables for the prediction of low back work status.

Authors:  Martijn W Heymans; Jon J Ford; Joan M McMeeken; Alexander Chan; Henrica C W de Vet; Willem van Mechelen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2007-06-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.