Literature DB >> 12660372

Early prognostic factors for duration on temporary total benefits in the first year among workers with compensated occupational soft tissue injuries.

S Hogg-Johnson1, D C Cole.   

Abstract

AIMS: To develop a model of prognosis for time receiving workers' compensation wage replacement benefits in the first year.
METHODS: A prospective cohort of 907 injured workers off work because of soft tissue injuries was followed for one year through structured telephone interviews and administrative data sources. Workers were recruited at workers' compensation claim registration. Only those still off work at four weeks post-registration were included in the analysis. Data from several domains (demographics, clinical factors, workplace factors, recovery expectations) were collected at approximately two weeks and a subset again at four weeks. Outcome was duration on total temporary wage replacement benefits. Variable selection was carried out in two steps using content experts and backward elimination with the Cox model.
RESULTS: Body region specific functional status, change in pain, workplace offers of arrangements for return to work, and recovery expectations were independently predictive of time on benefits. Change in pain and workplace offers interacted, so the largest mutual association occurred for those whose pain was getting worse-that is, reduction in median duration from 112.5 to 32.5 days. Across observed values, widely different recovery profiles of groups of workers resulted; for example, at four months, only one third of the highest risk group had gone off benefits while over 95% of the lowest risk group had done so.
CONCLUSIONS: Focus on a relatively small set of prognostic factors should enable occupational health practitioners to triage injured workers within the first month and concentrate on those requiring additional assistance to return to work.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12660372      PMCID: PMC1740514          DOI: 10.1136/oem.60.4.244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  33 in total

1.  Modified work: prevalence and characteristics in a sample of workers with soft-tissue injuries.

Authors:  A S Brooker; D C Cole; S Hogg-Johnson; J Smith; J W Frank
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.162

2.  Risk factors associated with the transition from acute to chronic occupational back pain.

Authors:  Marlene Fransen; Mark Woodward; Robyn Norton; Carolyn Coggan; Martin Dawe; Nicolette Sheridan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Prognostic factors for return to work after a first compensated episode of back pain.

Authors:  C Infante-Rivard; M Lortie
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  The effectiveness of an early active intervention program for workers with soft-tissue injuries. The Early Claimant Cohort Study.

Authors:  S J Sinclair; S H Hogg-Johnson; M V Mondloch; S A Shields
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 5.  Disability resulting from occupational low back pain. Part II: What do we know about secondary prevention? A review of the scientific evidence on prevention after disability begins.

Authors:  J W Frank; A S Brooker; S E DeMaio; M S Kerr; A Maetzel; H S Shannon; T J Sullivan; R W Norman; R P Wells
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 6.  Disability resulting from occupational low back pain. Part I: What do we know about primary prevention? A review of the scientific evidence on prevention before disability begins.

Authors:  J W Frank; M S Kerr; A S Brooker; S E DeMaio; A Maetzel; H S Shannon; T J Sullivan; R W Norman; R P Wells
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  Prognosis of nonspecific work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the neck and upper extremity.

Authors:  D C Cole; P L Hudak
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.214

8.  The dominant role of psychosocial risk factors in the development of chronic low back pain disability.

Authors:  R J Gatchel; P B Polatin; T G Mayer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Early prediction of chronic disability after occupational low back injury.

Authors:  R G Hazard; L D Haugh; S Reid; J B Preble; L MacDonald
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  A population-based, randomized clinical trial on back pain management.

Authors:  P Loisel; L Abenhaim; P Durand; J M Esdaile; S Suissa; L Gosselin; R Simard; J Turcotte; J Lemaire
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  34 in total

Review 1.  Readiness for return to work following injury or illness: conceptualizing the interpersonal impact of health care, workplace, and insurance factors.

Authors:  Renée-Louise Franche; Niklas Krause
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2002-12

2.  Functional limitations and well-being in injured municipal workers: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Marion Gillen; Sarah A Jewell; Julia A Faucett; Edward Yelin
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2004-06

3.  Comparing current definitions of return to work: a measurement approach.

Authors:  I A Steenstra; H Lee; E M M de Vroome; J W Busse; S J Hogg-Johnson
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2012-09

4.  Individual expectation: an overlooked, but pertinent, factor in the treatment of individuals experiencing musculoskeletal pain.

Authors:  Joel E Bialosky; Mark D Bishop; Joshua A Cleland
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2010-06-30

Review 5.  [Patients with low back pain. Psychosocial work-related factors and return to work - a literature review].

Authors:  M Bethge
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 6.  Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative literature.

Authors:  Renée-Louise Franche; Kimberley Cullen; Judy Clarke; Emma Irvin; Sandra Sinclair; John Frank
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-12

7.  Studies in occupational epidemiology and the risk of overadjustment.

Authors:  E M de Croon
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 8.  Return to work after injury: a review of evidence regarding expectations and injury perceptions, and their influence on outcome.

Authors:  Joanna Fadyl; Kathryn McPherson
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2008-10-29

Review 9.  Exploring the diversity of conceptualizations of work (dis)ability: a scoping review of published definitions.

Authors:  Valérie Lederer; Patrick Loisel; Michèle Rivard; François Champagne
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2014-06

Review 10.  Measuring return to work.

Authors:  Radoslaw Wasiak; Amanda E Young; Richard T Roessler; Kathryn M McPherson; Mireille N M van Poppel; Johannes R Anema
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2007-10-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.