Literature DB >> 6228020

Measuring physical and psychosocial function in patients with low-back pain.

R A Deyo, A K Diehl.   

Abstract

Techniques for assessing daily function in Patients with back pain are generally crude and limited in scope. We therefore examined a "health status" questionnaire, the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) to assess its measurement characteristics in such patients. Eighty patients with mechanical low-back pain completed the SIP and a physical examination at a walk-in visit and again three weeks later. Test-retest reliability of the SIP was substantial. Biologic validity was confirmed by significant correlations with age, pain duration, spine flexion, straight leg raising, and pain severity. Validity of psychosocial subscales was confirmed by significant associations with patient anxiety and psychiatric problems. Scores changed in the expected directions when patients were evaluated three weeks later. The SIP is thus valid, reliable, sensitive to clinical changes, and comprehensively assesses a wide range of dysfunctions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6228020     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198309000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  18 in total

Review 1.  Measuring health status? A review of the sickness impact and functional limitations profiles.

Authors:  S J Williams
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  1996-11

2.  Validation of the Korean version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.

Authors:  Jung Sub Lee; Dong Ho Lee; Kuen Tak Suh; Jeung Il Kim; Jong Min Lim; Tae Sik Goh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-04-10       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Adaptive responses among Dutch elderly: the impact of eight chronic medical conditions on health-related quality of life.

Authors:  G I Kempen; J Ormel; E I Brilman; J Relyveld
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness.

Authors:  H Beckerman; M E Roebroeck; G J Lankhorst; J G Becher; P D Bezemer; A L Verbeek
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Pain catastrophizing predicts pain intensity during a neurodynamic test for the median nerve in healthy participants.

Authors:  Jason M Beneciuk; Mark D Bishop; Steven Z George
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2010-03-31

6.  Pitfalls in measuring the health status of Mexican Americans: comparative validity of the English and Spanish Sickness Impact Profile.

Authors:  R A Deyo
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Visual impairment, visual functioning, and quality of life assessments in patients with glaucoma.

Authors:  R K Parrish
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1996

8.  Comparison of yoga versus stretching for chronic low back pain: protocol for the Yoga Exercise Self-care (YES) trial.

Authors:  Karen J Sherman; Daniel C Cherkin; Andrea J Cook; Rene J Hawkes; Richard A Deyo; Robert Wellman; Partap S Khalsa
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Psychiatric disorders and functional impairment in patients with persistent dizziness.

Authors:  K Kroenke; C A Lucas; M L Rosenberg; B J Scherokman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Clinical course and prognostic factors in acute low back pain: an inception cohort study in primary care practice.

Authors:  J Coste; G Delecoeuillerie; A Cohen de Lara; J M Le Parc; J B Paolaggi
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-02-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.