Literature DB >> 11706777

Occupational psychological factors increase the risk for back pain: a systematic review.

S J Linton1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this review was to summarize current knowledge concerning the role of psychological workplace variables in back pain. To this end the literature on psychological factors and back pain was systematically searched and analyzed. Psychological and medical databases and cross-referencing were used to locate 975 studies. To be included in this review, studies had to have a prospective design, include a psychological predictor variable, report on back pain, and be published in English. Twenty-one studies fulfilled the criteria for psychological workplace factors. The results showed a clear association between psychological variables and future back pain. There was strong evidence that job satisfaction, monotonous tasks, work relations, demands, stress, and perceived ability to work were related to future back pain problems. Further, moderate evidence was established for work pace, control, emotional effort at work, and the belief that work is dangerous. There was inconclusive evidence about work content. The attributable fraction indicated that substantial reductions in the number of cases of back pain could be achieved if the exposure to the psychological risk factor was eliminated. Although the methodological quality of the studies varied, they were deemed to provide "best evidence," and the consistency of the findings suggests that they are relatively robust. It is concluded that psychological work factors play a significant role in future back pain problems. However, there is still a lack of knowledge concerning the mechanisms by which these operate. These results suggest that a change in the way we view and deal with back pain is needed. Applying knowledge about psychological factors at work might enhance prevention as well as rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11706777     DOI: 10.1023/a:1016656225318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  25 in total

1.  Can we screen for problematic back pain? A screening questionnaire for predicting outcome in acute and subacute back pain.

Authors:  S J Linton; K Halldén
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.442

2.  Predictors of sciatic pain among concrete reinforcement workers and house painters--a five-year follow-up.

Authors:  H Riihimäki; G Wickström; K Hänninen; T Luopajärvi
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 5.024

3.  Impact of chronic pain patients' job perception variables on actual return to work.

Authors:  D A Fishbain; R B Cutler; H L Rosomoff; T Khalil; R Steele-Rosomoff
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.442

4.  Comparison of spinal health indicators in predicting spinal status in a 1-year longitudinal study.

Authors:  M Rossignol; M Lortie; E Ledoux
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Psychosocial factors in the workplace--do they predict new episodes of low back pain? Evidence from the South Manchester Back Pain Study.

Authors:  A C Papageorgiou; G J Macfarlane; E Thomas; P R Croft; M I Jayson; A J Silman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Predicting return to work for lower back pain patients receiving worker's compensation.

Authors:  J Lancourt; M Kettelhut
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Risk factors of chronicity in lumbar disc patients. A prospective investigation of biologic, psychologic, and social predictors of therapy outcome.

Authors:  M Hasenbring; G Marienfeld; D Kuhlendahl; D Soyka
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Fitness and lifestyle parameters fail to predict back injuries in nurses.

Authors:  A E Ready; S L Boreskie; S A Law; R Russell
Journal:  Can J Appl Physiol       Date:  1993-03

9.  Clinical course and prognostic factors in acute low back pain: an inception cohort study in primary care practice.

Authors:  J Coste; G Delecoeuillerie; A Cohen de Lara; J M Le Parc; J B Paolaggi
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-02-26

10.  The Swedish back school in chronic low back pain. Part II. Factors predicting the outcome.

Authors:  H Hurri
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1989
View more
  57 in total

Review 1.  Psychosocial factors at work in relation to low back pain and consequences of low back pain; a systematic, critical review of prospective cohort studies.

Authors:  J Hartvigsen; S Lings; C Leboeuf-Yde; L Bakketeig
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Individual participant data meta-analysis of mechanical workplace risk factors and low back pain.

Authors:  Lauren E Griffith; Harry S Shannon; Richard P Wells; Stephen D Walter; Donald C Cole; Pierre Côté; John Frank; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson; Lacey E Langlois
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  [Patients with low back pain. Psychosocial work-related factors and return to work - a literature review].

Authors:  M Bethge
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  Prognosis and the identification of workers risking disability: research issues and directions for future research.

Authors:  Steven J Linton; Doug Gross; Izabela Z Schultz; Chris Main; Pierre Côté; Glenn Pransky; William Johnson
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-12

5.  Course and prognosis of elbow complaints: a cohort study in general practice.

Authors:  S D M Bot; J M van der Waal; C B Terwee; D A W M van der Windt; L M Bouter; J Dekker
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2005-02-11       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 6.  Reducing sickness absence from work due to low back pain: how well do intervention strategies match modifiable risk factors?

Authors:  William S Shaw; Steven J Linton; Glenn Pransky
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-12

Review 7.  Low back pain investigations and prognosis: a review.

Authors:  K M Refshauge; C G Maher
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 8.  Interventions to prevent back pain and back injury in nurses: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anna P Dawson; Skye N McLennan; Stefan D Schiller; Gwendolen A Jull; Paul W Hodges; Simon Stewart
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 4.402

9.  Physical and psychosocial risk factors for musculoskeletal disorders in Brazilian and Italian nurses.

Authors:  Michele Carugno; Angela Cecilia Pesatori; Marco Mario Ferrario; Andrea Lepos Ferrari; Fábio Jose da Silva; Aline Caldas Martins; Vanda Elisa Andres Felli; David Coggon; Matteo Bonzini
Journal:  Cad Saude Publica       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.632

10.  The Key Role of Pain Catastrophizing in the Disability of Patients with Acute Back Pain.

Authors:  C Ramírez-Maestre; R Esteve; G Ruiz-Párraga; L Gómez-Pérez; A E López-Martínez
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2017-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.