Literature DB >> 8133122

Intra- and interobserver variability of a fast on-line quantitative coronary angiographic system.

W Desmet1, J L Willems, M Vrolix, J van Lierde, G Byttebier, J Piessens.   

Abstract

To evaluate intra- and interobserver variability of an on-line quantitative coronary angiographic system, 2 independent observers measured 166 primary lesions excluding total occlusions before and after coronary angioplasty. Each observer repeated his measurement 3 times at 14 days interval. The average percent diameter stenosis results obtained by observer 1 and 2 were almost identical, before (62.2% +/- 12.0% and 62.6% +/- 11.4%, NS) and after (27.1% +/- 12.0% and 26.9% +/- 11.3%, NS) angioplasty. Variability was expressed as 95% limits of agreement (mean difference +/- 2 x SD). The intra-observer variability of observer 1 ranged from -6.6% to 6.6% before angioplasty and from -9.6% to 9.6% after angioplasty. The corresponding limits of observer 2 were -8.0% to 7.5% and -8.3% to 8.5%, respectively. The interobserver variability ranged from -10.4% to 9.6% before versus -12.5% to 13.1% after angioplasty. This variability was not influenced by vessel size. The widening of the limits observed after angioplasty was largely due to an increased variability in the measurements of the absolute minimal luminal diameter but not of the reference segment. We conclude that the intra- and interobserver variability of measurements obtained with an on-line quantitative angiographic system used for guiding coronary interventions is acceptable and without systematic bias in any direction for a wide range of primary coronary stenoses. However, the variability increases when images are acquired immediately after angioplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8133122     DOI: 10.1007/bf01137151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Card Imaging        ISSN: 0167-9899


  15 in total

1.  Measurement imprecision: ignore or investigate?

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-03-07       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Establishing comprehensive, quantitative criteria for detection of restenosis and remodeling after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

Authors:  N B de Cesare; P R Williamson; N B Moore; S F DeBoe; G B Mancini
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1992-01-01       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Quantitative angiographic and statistical methods to assess serial changes in coronary luminal diameter and implications for atherosclerosis regression trials.

Authors:  C M Gibson; T Sandor; P H Stone; R C Pasternak; B Rosner; F M Sacks
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1992-05-15       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Variabilities in measurement of coronary arterial dimensions resulting from variations in cineframe selection.

Authors:  J H Reiber; P van Eldik-Helleman; N Visser-Akkerman; C J Kooijman; P W Serruys
Journal:  Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn       Date:  1988

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Variability in the analysis of coronary arteriograms.

Authors:  T A DeRouen; J A Murray; W Owen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Assessment of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by quantitative coronary angiography: diameter versus densitometric area measurements.

Authors:  P W Serruys; J H Reiber; W Wijns; M van den Brand; C J Kooijman; H J ten Katen; P G Hugenholtz
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1984-09-01       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Reproducibility of coronary arteriographic reading in the coronary artery surgery study (CASS).

Authors:  L D Fisher; M P Judkins; J Lesperance; A Cameron; P Swaye; T Ryan; C Maynard; M Bourassa; J W Kennedy; A Gosselin; H Kemp; D Faxon; L Wexler; K B Davis
Journal:  Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn       Date:  1982

Review 9.  Quantitative and qualitative coronary angiographic analysis: review of methods, utility, and limitations.

Authors:  J B Hermiller; J T Cusma; L A Spero; D F Fortin; M B Harding; T M Bashore
Journal:  Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn       Date:  1992-02

10.  Reproducibility of a consensus panel in the interpretation of coronary angiograms.

Authors:  M E Sanmarco; S H Brooks; D H Blankenhorn
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 4.749

View more
  3 in total

1.  The impact of vessel and catheter position on the measurement accuracy in catheter-based quantitative coronary angiography.

Authors:  W Wunderlich; B Roehrig; F Fischer; H R Arntz; R Agrawal; A Morguet; H P Schultheiss; D Horstkotte
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1998-08

2.  Biocompatibility of biodegradable and nonbiodegradable polymer-coated stents implanted in porcine peripheral arteries.

Authors:  I K De Scheerder; K L Wilczek; E V Verbeken; J Vandorpe; P N Lan; E Schacht; J Piessens; H De Geest
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Long term effects of nisoldipine on the progression of coronary atherosclerosis and the occurrence of clinical events: the NICOLE study.

Authors:  J A Dens; W J Desmet; P Coussement; I K De Scheerder; K Kostopoulos; P Kerdsinchai; C Supanantaroek; J H Piessens
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.994

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.