BACKGROUND: Earlier angiographic studies have suggested that calcium antagonists may prevent the formation of new coronary lesions and the progression of minimal lesions. Conversely, a meta-analysis suggested that these drugs may increase cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in patients with coronary heart disease. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether nisoldipine retards the progression of coronary atherosclerosis or reduces the occurrence of clinical events. DESIGN AND SETTING: The NICOLE study (NIsoldipinein COronary artery disease in LEuven) is a single centre, randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial with coronary angiography at baseline, six months, and three years of follow up. PATIENTS: 826 patients who had undergone successful coronary angioplasty were randomised to nisoldipine 40 mg once daily or placebo. The intention to treat and per protocol population consisted of 819 and 578 patients, respectively. RESULTS: In the per protocol population, 625 of the nisoldipine treated and 655 of the placebotreated patients (NS) showed angiographic progression in at least one coronary arterial segment, defined as an increase in diameter stenosis of > or = 13%. The average minimum luminal diameter of the non-dilated lesions decreased by 0.163 mm and 0.167 mm in the nisoldipine and placebo groups, respectively (NS). The respective numbers of new lesions detected were 7 and 13 (NS). In the intention to treat population, the rates of death, stroke, and acute myocardial infarction were similar in both treatment groups. However, nisoldipine use was associated with fewer revascularisation procedures and thus the percentage of patients with any clinical event was lower (44.6% v 52.6%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS:Nisoldipine has no demonstrable effect on the angiographic progression of coronary atherosclerosis or the risk of major cardiovascular events but its use is associated with fewer revascularisation procedures.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Earlier angiographic studies have suggested that calcium antagonists may prevent the formation of new coronary lesions and the progression of minimal lesions. Conversely, a meta-analysis suggested that these drugs may increase cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in patients with coronary heart disease. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether nisoldipineretards the progression of coronary atherosclerosis or reduces the occurrence of clinical events. DESIGN AND SETTING: The NICOLE study (NIsoldipine in COronary artery disease in LEuven) is a single centre, randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial with coronary angiography at baseline, six months, and three years of follow up. PATIENTS: 826 patients who had undergone successful coronary angioplasty were randomised to nisoldipine 40 mg once daily or placebo. The intention to treat and per protocol population consisted of 819 and 578 patients, respectively. RESULTS: In the per protocol population, 625 of the nisoldipine treated and 655 of the placebo treated patients (NS) showed angiographic progression in at least one coronary arterial segment, defined as an increase in diameter stenosis of > or = 13%. The average minimum luminal diameter of the non-dilated lesions decreased by 0.163 mm and 0.167 mm in the nisoldipine and placebo groups, respectively (NS). The respective numbers of new lesions detected were 7 and 13 (NS). In the intention to treat population, the rates of death, stroke, and acute myocardial infarction were similar in both treatment groups. However, nisoldipine use was associated with fewer revascularisation procedures and thus the percentage of patients with any clinical event was lower (44.6% v 52.6%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS:Nisoldipine has no demonstrable effect on the angiographic progression of coronary atherosclerosis or the risk of major cardiovascular events but its use is associated with fewer revascularisation procedures.
Authors: J A Dens; W J Desmet; P Coussement; I K De Scheerder; K Kostopoulos; P Kerdsinchai; C Supanantaroek; J H Piessens Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2001-01-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: B Pitt; R P Byington; C D Furberg; D B Hunninghake; G B Mancini; M E Miller; W Riley Journal: Circulation Date: 2000-09-26 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Ali Albasri; Miriam Hattle; Constantinos Koshiaris; Anna Dunnigan; Ben Paxton; Sarah Emma Fox; Margaret Smith; Lucinda Archer; Brooke Levis; Rupert A Payne; Richard D Riley; Nia Roberts; Kym I E Snell; Sarah Lay-Flurrie; Juliet Usher-Smith; Richard Stevens; F D Richard Hobbs; Richard J McManus; James P Sheppard Journal: BMJ Date: 2021-02-10