Literature DB >> 1544153

Quantitative and qualitative coronary angiographic analysis: review of methods, utility, and limitations.

J B Hermiller1, J T Cusma, L A Spero, D F Fortin, M B Harding, T M Bashore.   

Abstract

Coronary angiography continues to be the pivotal study in the diagnosis and treatment of ischemic cardiac disease. Although angiographic equipment and imaging techniques have advanced over the past three decades, the analysis of coronary angiograms, by visual estimated percent diameter stenosis, has remained unchanged in most clinical catheterization laboratories. Rapid, computerized angiographic analysis systems are now available that remedy the inherent imprecision and inaccuracies plaguing visual coronary analysis. Despite its advantages, successful QCA is quite dependent on meticulous attention to radiographic and angiographic technique, even more so than with visual analysis. Although the available QCA systems can reproducibly and accurately define the site and degree of coronary stenosis, they cannot routinely determine whether an obstruction is flow limiting. Several methods, some based on extrapolations of quantitative measures alone, and others based on digital subtraction angiography, have been developed to determine the physiologic impact of a given coronary lesion. Recent observations have demonstrated, however, that even if the physiologic consequences of an obstruction are known, the prognosis of the lesion over time cannot be predicted. The qualitative, morphologic characteristics of a lesion are as, or more, important than the quantitative lesion attributes in determining an atheroma's behavior and stability, and hence, qualitative descriptors should be incorporated into QCA analyses. Although not currently available, future QCA systems will provide, by automated analysis, reproducible and accurate measures of absolute obstruction, physiologic data describing the flow limiting characteristics of a lesion, and qualitative, morphologic lesion descriptors. Implementation of these systems should provide more consistent and accurate prognostic and pathophysiologic information, thereby helping to refine and more effectively direct therapeutic interventions in coronary artery disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1544153     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.1810250207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn        ISSN: 0098-6569


  25 in total

1.  Normal Proximal Coronary Artery Diameters in Adults from India as Assessed by Computed Tomography Angiography.

Authors:  Manjappa Mahadevappa; Madhav Hegde; Ravi Math
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-05-01

2.  Impact of initial platelet count on baseline angiographic finding and end-points in ST-elevation myocardial infarction referred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Sahin Kaplan; Safiye Tuba Kaplan; Abdulkadir Kiris; Omer Gedikli
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-04-15

3.  Reproducibility of quantitative coronary analysis, Assessment of variability due to frame selection, different observers, and different cinefilmless laboratories.

Authors:  P A Sirnes; Y Myreng; P Mølstad; S Golf
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1996-09

4.  An analogue laser optical disc in comparison with cinefilm for visual analysis of coronary narrowings before and after coronary angioplasty.

Authors:  S A Chamuleau; J J Piek; W B Hanekamp; Y E Appelman; K T Koch; R J Peters; W E Kok; G Bloemhard; G A la Rivière; G K David
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1998-02

5.  Comparison of QCA systems.

Authors:  U Dietz; H J Rupprecht; R Brennecke; H P Fritsch; J Woltmann; S Blankenberg; J Meyer
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1997-08

Review 6.  [Modern angiographic diagnostic techniques in the catheter laboratory].

Authors:  H Rittger; A-M Sinha; J Brachmann
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.443

7.  Visual and automatic grading of coronary artery stenoses with 64-slice CT angiography in reference to invasive angiography.

Authors:  Stephanie Busch; Thorsten R C Johnson; Konstantin Nikolaou; Franz von Ziegler; Andreas Knez; Maximilian F Reiser; Christoph R Becker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-12-16       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Which media are most likely to solve the archival problem?

Authors:  J T Cusma; D F Fortin; L A Spero; B R Groshong; T M Bashore
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1994-09

9.  Coronary pressure measurement based decision making for percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Kohichiro Iwasaki; Shozo Kusachi
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2009-11

10.  Relationship of the percentage of circulating endothelial progenitor cell to the severity of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Mien-Cheng Chen; Chien-Jen Chen; Cheng-Hsu Yang; Wen-Hao Liu; Chih-Yuan Fang; Yuan-Kai Hsieh; Hsueh-Wen Chang
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 2.037

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.