Literature DB >> 8113128

Contralateral suppression of non-linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.

C I Berlin1, L J Hood, H Wen, P Szabo, R P Cecola, P Rigby, D F Jackson.   

Abstract

Click-evoked otoacoustic emissions from nominal 80 dB pSP (peak sound pressure) 80-microseconds pulses presented at 50 pulses per second were collected from the right ears of eleven normal hearing subjects using an ILO88 Otodynamic Analyzer in the non-linear mode. Clicks, pure tones, and narrow bands of noise were then presented to their left ears through insert earphones. The 80-microseconds contralateral clicks ranged in intensity from 80 dB pSP in 5 dB steps down to 60 dB pSP but data on only 10 of the subjects were collected successfully. The pure tones and narrow bands of noise centered at 250, 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz were also presented through insert phones at 20, 40, 60 and 80 dB HL (Hearing Level) to all 11 subjects. The mean overall 'echo amplitude' without contralateral stimuli was 11 dB SPL and underwent more than 3 dB of overall suppression in response to the noises which were the most effective of the contralateral suppressors. When we analyzed the echo suppression to noise in 2-ms segments, we found consistent contralateral suppression of 3-4 dB concentrated in the time zones after 8 ms. Time shifts of more than 200 microseconds between the control and experimental traces were also observed in the same zones. The clicks were the next most effective suppressors, but showed their amplitude and time effects in somewhat earlier time zones. The tones were the least effective suppressors suggesting that efferent effects we measured in the human system are not strongly tonotopic. Because 'non-linear' mode high intensity clicks were deliberately selected as stimuli to evoke the TEOAE's, the emissions and their suppression can represent neither the 'true' TEOAE nor all of the efferent system's suppression abilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8113128     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(93)90015-s

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  21 in total

1.  Recovery from on- and off-frequency forward masking in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Click-Evoked Auditory Efferent Activity: Rate and Level Effects.

Authors:  Sriram Boothalingam; Julianne Kurke; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-07

3.  Simultaneous measurement of noise-activated middle-ear muscle reflex and stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Shawn S Goodman; Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-03-28

4.  Medial olivocochlear efferent reflex in humans: otoacoustic emission (OAE) measurement issues and the advantages of stimulus frequency OAEs.

Authors:  John J Guinan; Bradford C Backus; Watjana Lilaonitkul; Vered Aharonson
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-06-13

5.  Medial olivocochlear-induced transient-evoked otoacoustic emission amplitude shifts in individual subjects.

Authors:  Shawn S Goodman; Ian B Mertes; James D Lewis; Diana K Weissbeck
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-08-28

6.  Auditory processing disorders with and without central auditory discrimination deficits.

Authors:  Alexandra Annemarie Ludwig; Michael Fuchs; Eberhard Kruse; Brigitte Uhlig; Sonja Annette Kotz; Rudolf Rübsamen
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-06

7.  Evaluation of Contralateral Suppression of Otoacoustic Emissions in Bharatanatyam Dancers and Non-Dancers.

Authors:  Joel Joseph; Ankita Suman; G K Jayasree; Prashanth Prabhu
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.017

8.  Functional Interplay Between the Putative Measures of Rostral and Caudal Efferent Regulation of Speech Perception in Noise.

Authors:  Sandeep Maruthy; U Ajith Kumar; G Nike Gnanateja
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-04-26

9.  Acoustic stimulation of human medial olivocochlear efferents reduces stimulus-frequency and click-evoked otoacoustic emission delays: Implications for cochlear filter bandwidths.

Authors:  Nikolas A Francis; John J Guinan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Adaptation to Noise in Human Speech Recognition Depends on Noise-Level Statistics and Fast Dynamic-Range Compression.

Authors:  Miriam I Marrufo-Pérez; Dora Del Pilar Sturla-Carreto; Almudena Eustaquio-Martín; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.