Literature DB >> 20649220

Recovery from on- and off-frequency forward masking in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.

Magdalena Wojtczak1, Andrew J Oxenham.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the possible mechanisms underlying an effect reported earlier [Wojtczak, M., and Oxenham, A. J. (2009). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 270-281] in normal-hearing listeners, whereby recovery from forward masking can be slower for off-frequency tonal maskers than for on-frequency tonal maskers that produce the same amount of masking at a 0-ms masker-signal delay. To rule out potential effects of confusion between the tonal signal and tonal masker, one condition used a noise-band forward masker. To test whether the effect involved temporal build-up, another condition used a short-duration (30-ms) forward masker. To test whether the effect is dependent on normal cochlear function, conditions were tested in five listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. For the 150-ms noise maskers, the data from normal-hearing listeners replicated the findings from the previous study that used tonal maskers. In contrast, no significant difference in recovery from on- and off-frequency masking was observed for the 30-ms tonal maskers in normal-hearing listeners, or for the 150-ms tonal maskers in hearing-impaired listeners. Overall, the results are consistent with a mechanism based on efferent feedback that affects the recovery from forward masking in the normal auditory system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20649220      PMCID: PMC2921427          DOI: 10.1121/1.3436566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  34 in total

1.  AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE ACOUSTIC IMPEDANCE OF THE MIDDLE EAR AND ITS TRANSMISSION PROPERTIES.

Authors:  A R MOLLER
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1965 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.494

2.  Time-course of the human medial olivocochlear reflex.

Authors:  Bradford C Backus; John J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Basilar-membrane nonlinearity and the growth of forward masking.

Authors:  C J Plack; A J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  A behavioral measure of basilar-membrane nonlinearity in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  A J Oxenham; C J Plack
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Confusion effects with sinusoidal and narrow-band noise forward maskers.

Authors:  D L Neff
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effects of contralateral sound on auditory-nerve responses. II. Dependence on stimulus variables.

Authors:  E H Warren; M C Liberman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Comparing different estimates of cochlear compression in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Peninah S Rosengard; Andrew J Oxenham; Louis D Braida
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Contralateral suppression of non-linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  C I Berlin; L J Hood; H Wen; P Szabo; R P Cecola; P Rigby; D F Jackson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Reflex control of the human inner ear: a half-octave offset in medial efferent feedback that is consistent with an efferent role in the control of masking.

Authors:  Watjana Lilaonitkul; John J Guinan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Temporal masking curves for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Thomas H Stainsby; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-07-14       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  12 in total

1.  Effect of human auditory efferent feedback on cochlear gain and compression.

Authors:  Ifat Yasin; Vit Drga; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Individual differences in behavioral estimates of cochlear nonlinearities.

Authors:  Gayla L Poling; Amy R Horwitz; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-09-22

3.  Temporal masking functions for listeners with real and simulated hearing loss.

Authors:  Joseph G Desloge; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Zachary D Perez; Lorraine A Delhorne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Computational modeling of individual differences in behavioral estimates of cochlear nonlinearities.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-30

5.  Level-dependent changes in perception of speech envelope cues.

Authors:  Judy R Dubno; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Xin Wang; Amy R Horwitz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-08-08

6.  Behavioral measures of cochlear compression and temporal resolution as predictors of speech masking release in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Melanie J Gregan; Peggy B Nelson; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  ON and OFF inhibition as mechanisms for forward masking in the inferior colliculus: a modeling study.

Authors:  Yan Gai
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Auditory filter tuning inferred with short sinusoidal and notched-noise maskers.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Is off-frequency overshoot caused by adaptation of suppression?

Authors:  Mark Fletcher; Jessica de Boer; Katrin Krumbholz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-12-03

10.  Forward-masking recovery and the assumptions of the temporal masking curve method of inferring cochlear compression.

Authors:  Patricia Pérez-González; Peter T Johannesen; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2014-12-21       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.