Literature DB >> 16568366

Simultaneous measurement of noise-activated middle-ear muscle reflex and stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Shawn S Goodman1, Douglas H Keefe.   

Abstract

Otoacoustic emissions serve as a noninvasive probe of the medial olivocochlear (MOC) reflex. Stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) elicited by a low-level probe tone may be the optimal type of emission for studying MOC effects because at low levels, the probe itself does not elicit the MOC reflex [Guinan et al. (2003) J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 4:521]. Based on anatomical considerations, the MOC reflex activated by ipsilateral acoustic stimulation (mediated by the crossed olivocochlear bundle) is predicted to be stronger than the reflex to contralateral stimulation. Broadband noise is an effective activator of the MOC reflex; however, it is also an effective activator of the middle-ear muscle (MEM) reflex, which can make results difficult to interpret. The MEM reflex may be activated at lower levels than measured clinically, and most previous human studies have not explicitly included measurements to rule out MEM reflex contamination. The current study addressed these issues using a higher-frequency SFOAE probe tone to test for cochlear changes mediated by the MOC reflex, while simultaneously monitoring the MEM reflex using a low-frequency probe tone. Broadband notched noise was presented ipsilaterally at various levels to elicit probe-tone shifts. Measurements are reported for 15 normal-hearing subjects. With the higher-frequency probe near 1.5 kHz, only 20% of subjects showed shifts consistent with an MOC reflex in the absence of an MEM-induced shift. With the higher-frequency probe near 3.5 kHz, up to 40% of subjects showed shifts in the absence of an MEM-induced shift. However, these responses had longer time courses than expected for MOC-induced shifts, and may have been dominated by other cochlear processes, rather than MOC reflex. These results suggest caution in the interpretation of effects observed using ipsilaterally presented acoustic activators intended to excite the MOC reflex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16568366      PMCID: PMC2504580          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-006-0028-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  54 in total

1.  The origin of periodicity in the spectrum of evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  G Zweig; C A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Frequency-dependent enhancement of basilar membrane velocity during olivocochlear bundle stimulation.

Authors:  D F Dolan; M H Guo; A L Nuttall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effect of contralateral auditory stimuli on active cochlear micro-mechanical properties in human subjects.

Authors:  L Collet; D T Kemp; E Veuillet; R Duclaux; A Moulin; A Morgon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects: dependence on stimulus variables.

Authors:  E Veuillet; L Collet; R Duclaux
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  A novel cholinergic "slow effect" of efferent stimulation on cochlear potentials in the guinea pig.

Authors:  T S Sridhar; M C Liberman; M C Brown; W F Sewell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Sleep and active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects.

Authors:  P Froehlich; L Collet; J L Valatx; A Morgon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Frequency analysis of the contralateral suppression of evoked otoacoustic emissions by narrow-band noise.

Authors:  M Norman; A R Thornton
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1993-08

8.  Voluntary contraction of middle ear muscles: effects on input impedance, energy reflectance and spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  E M Burns; W A Harrison; J C Bulen; D H Keefe
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Contralateral suppression of non-linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  C I Berlin; L J Hood; H Wen; P Szabo; R P Cecola; P Rigby; D F Jackson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Differential effects of ear-canal pressure and contralateral acoustic stimulation on evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans.

Authors:  E Veuillet; L Collet; A Morgon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  20 in total

1.  Contralateral-noise effects on cochlear responses in anesthetized mice are dominated by feedback from an unknown pathway.

Authors:  Stéphane F Maison; Hajime Usubuchi; Douglas E Vetter; A Bélen Elgoyhen; Steven A Thomas; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Use of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions to investigate efferent and cochlear contributions to temporal overshoot.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; Kim S Schairer; John C Ellison; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Medial olivocochlear-induced transient-evoked otoacoustic emission amplitude shifts in individual subjects.

Authors:  Shawn S Goodman; Ian B Mertes; James D Lewis; Diana K Weissbeck
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-08-28

4.  Contralateral acoustic stimulation alters the magnitude and phase of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Ryan Deeter; Rebekah Abel; Lauren Calandruccio; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Properties of a nonlinear version of the stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission.

Authors:  Kyle P Walsh; Edward G Pasanen; Dennis McFadden
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Changes in otoacoustic emissions during selective auditory and visual attention.

Authors:  Kyle P Walsh; Edward G Pasanen; Dennis McFadden
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Exploring the role of feedback-based auditory reflexes in forward masking by schroeder-phase complexes.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Jordan A Beim; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-10-22

8.  Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions Provide No Evidence for the Role of Efferents in the Enhancement Effect.

Authors:  Jordan A Beim; Maxwell Elliott; Andrew J Oxenham; Magdalena Wojtczak
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-07-08

9.  Overshoot measured physiologically and psychophysically in the same human ears.

Authors:  Kyle P Walsh; Edward G Pasanen; Dennis McFadden
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Differentiating Middle Ear and Medial Olivocochlear Effects on Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions.

Authors:  Kendra L Marks; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-04-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.