Literature DB >> 30541728

Evaluation of Contralateral Suppression of Otoacoustic Emissions in Bharatanatyam Dancers and Non-Dancers.

Joel Joseph1, Ankita Suman1, G K Jayasree1, Prashanth Prabhu1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: There is limited literature regarding the objective estimation of auditory attention in healthy individuals who regularly practice dance. This study attempted to evaluate the contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions (OAE) in Bharatanatyam dancers and non-dancers.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included40 adults (20 dancers and 20 non-dancers) with normal hearing. The differences in the contralateral suppression of distortion product OAE between the groups were compared.
RESULTS: The results of the present study revealed that there was an increased amount of suppression of OAE in dancers compared with non-dancers. It suggests that dance practice enhances sensory perception and improves auditory attention. The constant practice of dance could have led to plasticity of the efferent auditory system.
CONCLUSION: Thus, dance training may be used to strengthen efferent auditory system functioning. However, further studies witha larger sample size are essential for better generalization of the results.

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30541728      PMCID: PMC6483444          DOI: 10.5152/iao.2018.5645

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Int Adv Otol        ISSN: 1308-7649            Impact factor:   1.017


  12 in total

1.  Stronger bilateral efferent influences on cochlear biomechanical activity in musicians than in non-musicians.

Authors:  X Perrot; C Micheyl; S Khalfa; L Collet
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1999-03-12       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Neural correlates of perceptual learning in the auditory brainstem: efferent activity predicts and reflects improvement at a speech-in-noise discrimination task.

Authors:  Jessica de Boer; A Roger D Thornton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Latency of contralateral sound-evoked auditory efferent suppression of otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  J C Hill; D K Prasher; L M Luxon
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 1.494

4.  Difference in cochlear efferent activity between musicians and non-musicians.

Authors:  C Micheyl; S Khalfa; X Perrot; L Collet
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1997-03-03       Impact factor: 1.837

5.  Changes in otoacoustic emissions during selective auditory and visual attention.

Authors:  Kyle P Walsh; Edward G Pasanen; Dennis McFadden
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Contralateral suppression of non-linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  C I Berlin; L J Hood; H Wen; P Szabo; R P Cecola; P Rigby; D F Jackson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Auditory selective attention in the human cochlea.

Authors:  M H Giard; L Collet; P Bouchet; J Pernier
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1994-01-07       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  On the role of the olivocochlear bundle in hearing: a case study.

Authors:  B Scharf; J Magnan; L Collet; E Ulmer; A Chays
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Temporal Resolution and Active Auditory Discrimination Skill in Vocal Musicians.

Authors:  Prawin Kumar; Himanshu Kumar Sanju; J Nikhil
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-12-17

10.  Early auditory processing in musicians and dancers during a contemporary dance piece.

Authors:  Hanna Poikonen; Petri Toiviainen; Mari Tervaniemi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  1 in total

1.  Evaluation of auditory working memory in Bharatanatyam dancers.

Authors:  Praveen Prakash; Anjana M Nath; Mereena Joy; Prashanth Prabhu
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2022-01-25
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.