Literature DB >> 24658855

Auditory processing disorders with and without central auditory discrimination deficits.

Alexandra Annemarie Ludwig, Michael Fuchs, Eberhard Kruse, Brigitte Uhlig, Sonja Annette Kotz, Rudolf Rübsamen.   

Abstract

Auditory processing disorder (APD) is defined as a processing deficit in the auditory modality and spans multiple processes. To date, APD diagnosis is mostly based on the utilization of speech material. Adequate nonspeech tests that allow differentiation between an actual central hearing disorder and related disorders such as specific language impairments are still not adequately available. In the present study, 84 children between 6 and 17 years of age (clinical group), referred to three audiological centers for APD diagnosis, were evaluated with standard audiological tests and additional auditory discrimination tests. Latter tests assessed the processing of basic acoustic features at two different stages of the ascending central auditory system: (1) auditory brainstem processing was evaluated by quantifying interaural frequency, level, and signal duration discrimination (interaural tests). (2) Diencephalic/telencephalic processing was assessed by varying the same acoustic parameters (plus signals with sinusoidal amplitude modulation), but presenting the test signals in conjunction with noise pulses to the contralateral ear (dichotic(signal/noise) tests). Data of children in the clinical group were referenced to normative data obtained from more than 300 normally developing healthy school children. The results in the audiological and the discrimination tests diverged widely. Of the 39 children that were diagnosed with APD in the audiological clinic, 30 had deficits in auditory performance. Even more alarming was the fact that of the 45 children with a negative APD diagnosis, 32 showed clear signs of a central hearing deficit. Based on these results, we suggest revising current diagnostic procedure to evaluate APD in order to more clearly differentiate between central auditory processing deficits and higher-order (cognitive and/or language) processing deficits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24658855      PMCID: PMC4010590          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-014-0450-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  107 in total

1.  Dynamic sensory sensitivity and children's word decoding skills.

Authors:  J B Talcott; C Witton; M F McLean; P C Hansen; A Rees; G G Green; J F Stein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Listening difficulties in children: bottom-up and top-down contributions.

Authors:  David R Moore
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 2.288

3.  Individual differences in auditory abilities.

Authors:  Gary R Kidd; Charles S Watson; Brian Gygi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of contralateral sound on auditory-nerve responses. II. Dependence on stimulus variables.

Authors:  E H Warren; M C Liberman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Random Gap Detection Test (RGDT) performance of individuals with central auditory processing disorders from 5 to 25 years of age.

Authors:  Karin Ziliotto Dias; Benoît Jutras; Isabela Olszanski Acrani; Liliane Desgualdo Pereira
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 1.675

6.  Using different criteria to diagnose (central) auditory processing disorder: how big a difference does it make?

Authors:  Wayne J Wilson; Wendy Arnott
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Nature of auditory processing disorder in children.

Authors:  David R Moore; Melanie A Ferguson; A Mark Edmondson-Jones; Sonia Ratib; Alison Riley
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Auditory neurophysiologic responses and discrimination deficits in children with learning problems.

Authors:  N Kraus; T J McGee; T D Carrell; S G Zecker; T G Nicol; D B Koch
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-08-16       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Maturation of visual and auditory temporal processing in school-aged children.

Authors:  Piers Dawes; Dorothy V M Bishop
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Characterization of the human superior olivary complex by calcium binding proteins and neurofilament H (SMI-32).

Authors:  Ivonne Bazwinsky; Heidegard Hilbig; Hans-Jürgen Bidmon; Rudolf Rübsamen
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2003-02-10       Impact factor: 3.215

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Decreased temporal precision of neuronal signaling as a candidate mechanism of auditory processing disorder.

Authors:  Conny Kopp-Scheinpflug; Bruce L Tempel
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 2.  Medial efferent mechanisms in children with auditory processing disorders.

Authors:  Srikanta K Mishra
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 3.169

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.