Literature DB >> 32680938

Adaptation to Noise in Human Speech Recognition Depends on Noise-Level Statistics and Fast Dynamic-Range Compression.

Miriam I Marrufo-Pérez1,2, Dora Del Pilar Sturla-Carreto1, Almudena Eustaquio-Martín1,2, Enrique A Lopez-Poveda3,2,4.   

Abstract

Human hearing adapts to background noise, as evidenced by the fact that listeners recognize more isolated words when words are presented later rather than earlier in noise. This adaptation likely occurs because the leading noise shifts ("adapts") the dynamic range of auditory neurons, which can improve the neural encoding of speech spectral and temporal cues. Because neural dynamic range adaptation depends on stimulus-level statistics, here we investigated the importance of "statistical" adaptation for improving speech recognition in noisy backgrounds. We compared the recognition of noised-masked words in the presence and in the absence of adapting noise precursors whose level was either constant or was changing every 50 ms according to different statistical distributions. Adaptation was measured for 28 listeners (9 men) and was quantified as the recognition improvement in the precursor relative to the no-precursor condition. Adaptation was largest for constant-level precursors and did not occur for highly fluctuating precursors, even when the two types of precursors had the same mean level and both activated the medial olivocochlear reflex. Instantaneous amplitude compression of the highly fluctuating precursor produced as much adaptation as the constant-level precursor did without compression. Together, results suggest that noise adaptation in speech recognition is probably mediated by neural dynamic range adaptation to the most frequent sound level. Further, they suggest that auditory peripheral compression per se, rather than the medial olivocochlear reflex, could facilitate noise adaptation by reducing the level fluctuations in the noise.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Recognizing speech in noise is challenging but can be facilitated by noise adaptation. The neural mechanisms underlying this adaptation remain unclear. Here, we report some benefits of adaptation for word-in-noise recognition and show that (1) adaptation occurs for stationary but not for highly fluctuating precursors with equal mean level; (2) both stationary and highly fluctuating noises activate the medial olivocochlear reflex; and (3) adaptation occurs even for highly fluctuating precursors when the stimuli are passed through a fast amplitude compressor. These findings suggest that noise adaptation reflects neural dynamic range adaptation to the most frequent noise level and that auditory peripheral compression, rather than the medial olivocochlear reflex, could facilitate noise adaptation.
Copyright © 2020 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory compression; dynamic range adaptation; medial olivocochlear reflex; speech recognition; statistical adaptation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32680938      PMCID: PMC7486663          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0469-20.2020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  73 in total

1.  Temporal fine-structure cues to speech and pure tone modulation in observers with sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall; John H Grose
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Single-tone intensity discrimination based on auditory-nerve rate responses in backgrounds of quiet, noise, and with stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle.

Authors:  R L Winslow; M B Sachs
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1988-09-15       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. III. Stereocilia damage and alterations of threshold tuning curves.

Authors:  M C Liberman; L W Dodds
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Neuronal responses to amplitude-modulated and pure-tone stimuli in the guinea pig inferior colliculus, and their modification by broadband noise.

Authors:  A Rees; A R Palmer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Inferred basilar-membrane response functions for listeners with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Christopher J Plack; Vit Drga; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Similarity of dynamic range adjustment in auditory nerve and cochlear nuclei.

Authors:  D J Gibson; E D Young; J A Costalupes
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Neural population coding of sound level adapts to stimulus statistics.

Authors:  Isabel Dean; Nicol S Harper; David McAlpine
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-11-06       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Age-dependent changes in temporal-fine-structure processing in the absence of peripheral hearing loss.

Authors:  Christian Füllgrabe
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.493

9.  Neural Responses and Perceptual Sensitivity to Sound Depend on Sound-Level Statistics.

Authors:  Björn Herrmann; Thomas Augereau; Ingrid S Johnsrude
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  The frequency limit of outer hair cell motility measured in vivo.

Authors:  Anna Vavakou; Nigel P Cooper; Marcel van der Heijden
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  4 in total

1.  Understanding degraded speech leads to perceptual gating of a brainstem reflex in human listeners.

Authors:  Heivet Hernández-Pérez; Jason Mikiel-Hunter; David McAlpine; Sumitrajit Dhar; Sriram Boothalingam; Jessica J M Monaghan; Catherine M McMahon
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 8.029

2.  Listening in complex acoustic scenes.

Authors:  Andrew J King; Kerry Mm Walker
Journal:  Curr Opin Physiol       Date:  2020-09-08

3.  Semantic Cues Modulate Children's and Adults' Processing of Audio-Visual Face Mask Speech.

Authors:  Julia Schwarz; Katrina Kechun Li; Jasper Hong Sim; Yixin Zhang; Elizabeth Buchanan-Worster; Brechtje Post; Jenny Louise Gibson; Kirsty McDougall
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-07-19

4.  Effect of Noise on Sleep and Autonomic Activity in Children according to Source.

Authors:  Jeonghwan Lee; Jangho Park; Jukab Lee; Joon-Ho Ahn; Chang Sun Sim; Kukju Kweon; Hyo-Won Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 2.153

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.