Literature DB >> 28447225

Functional Interplay Between the Putative Measures of Rostral and Caudal Efferent Regulation of Speech Perception in Noise.

Sandeep Maruthy1, U Ajith Kumar1, G Nike Gnanateja2.   

Abstract

Efferent modulation has been demonstrated to be very important for speech perception, especially in the presence of noise. We examined the functional relationship between two efferent systems: the rostral and caudal efferent pathways and their individual influences on speech perception in noise. Earlier studies have shown that these two efferent mechanisms were correlated with speech perception in noise. However, previously, these mechanisms were studied in isolation, and their functional relationship with each other was not investigated. We used a correlational design to study the relationship if any, between these two mechanisms in young and old normal hearing individuals. We recorded context-dependent brainstem encoding as an index of rostral efferent function and contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions as an index of caudal efferent function in groups with good and poor speech perception in noise. These efferent mechanisms were analysed for their relationship with each other and with speech perception in noise. We found that the two efferent mechanisms did not show any functional relationship. Interestingly, both the efferent mechanisms correlated with speech perception in noise and they even emerged as significant predictors. Based on the data, we posit that the two efferent mechanisms function relatively independently but with a common goal of fine-tuning the afferent input and refining auditory perception in degraded listening conditions.

Keywords:  ABR; brainstem; contextual encoding; corticofugal; efferent; olivocochlear bundle; otoacoustic emissions

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28447225      PMCID: PMC5532183          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-017-0623-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  72 in total

Review 1.  Effects of aging on auditory processing of speech.

Authors:  M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Influence of contralateral noise on distortion product latency in humans: is the medial olivocochlear efferent system involved?

Authors:  A L Giraud; J Wable; A Chays; L Collet; S Chéry-Croze
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Corticofugal modulation of initial sound processing in the brain.

Authors:  Feng Luo; Qianzhou Wang; Alireza Kashani; Jun Yan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Acoustic basis of context dependent brainstem encoding of speech.

Authors:  G Nike Gnanateja; Ranjeet Ranjan; Husna Firdose; Sujeet Kumar Sinha; Sandeep Maruthy
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  The subcortical auditory structures in the Mongolian gerbil: II. Frequency-related topography of the connections with cortical field AI.

Authors:  Eike Budinger; Michael Brosch; Henning Scheich; Judith Mylius
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 3.215

6.  Neural timing is linked to speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Erika Skoe; Bharath Chandrasekaran; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Speech-perception-in-noise deficits in dyslexia.

Authors:  Johannes C Ziegler; Catherine Pech-Georgel; Florence George; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2009-09

8.  Selective attention affects human brain stem frequency-following response.

Authors:  Gary C Galbraith; Darlene M Olfman; Todd M Huffman
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 1.837

9.  The effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-10-02

10.  The Corticofugal Effects of Auditory Cortex Microstimulation on Auditory Nerve and Superior Olivary Complex Responses Are Mediated via Alpha-9 Nicotinic Receptor Subunit.

Authors:  Cristian Aedo; Gonzalo Terreros; Alex León; Paul H Delano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Olivocochlear efferents: Their action, effects, measurement and uses, and the impact of the new conception of cochlear mechanical responses.

Authors:  John J Guinan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  The relationship between ipsilateral cochlear gain reduction and speech-in-noise recognition at positive and negative signal-to-noise ratios.

Authors:  Kristina DeRoy Milvae; Joshua M Alexander; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Individual differences in the attentional modulation of the human auditory brainstem response to speech inform on speech-in-noise deficits.

Authors:  Marina Saiz-Alía; Antonio Elia Forte; Tobias Reichenbach
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Frequency-Following Responses to Speech Sounds Are Highly Conserved across Species and Contain Cortical Contributions.

Authors:  G Nike Gnanateja; Kyle Rupp; Fernando Llanos; Madison Remick; Marianny Pernia; Srivatsun Sadagopan; Tobias Teichert; Taylor J Abel; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2021-12-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.