Literature DB >> 8800788

Single X-ray absorptiometry: performance characteristics and comparison with single photon absorptiometry.

J Borg1, A Møllgaard, B J Riis.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate a new device for measurement of forearm bone mass using the technique of single X-ray absorptiometry (SXA, DTX-100; Osteometer A/S, Rødovre, Denmark), and to compare the performance with the more traditional single photon absorptiometry (SPA, DT 100; Osteometer A/S, Rødovre, Denmark). The SPA phantom measurements showed a coefficient of variation of 0.43% and 0.42% for bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD), respectively (39 months including seven source changes). The SXA precision errors were slightly lower with values of 0.30% and 0.30%, respectively. The patient measurements showed SPA coefficients of variation of 0.85% and 0.99% (BMC and BMD) and SXA coefficients of variation of 0.56% and 0.83%, respectively. The correlation between SPA and SXA values performed in 377 individuals yielded r values of 0.99 and 0.98 for BMC and BMD, respectively. The correlations between SXA measurements of the dominant and non-dominant forearm yielded an r-value of 0.95, with a slope of 0.949 (p < 0.001) and an intercept of 0.204 (p < 0.05). The non-dominant forearm thus had approximately 3% lower BMC than the dominant (the same was true for BMD). Correlations to spine and femur ranged from r = 0.48 to r = 0.75. In conclusion, the new single X-ray absorptiometry forearm bone densitometer described in this paper has performance characteristics which allows it to be used both for diagnostic purposes and for the follow-up of treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8800788     DOI: 10.1007/bf01622260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  24 in total

1.  Bone mass measured by photon absorptiometry: comparison of forearm, heel, and spine.

Authors:  M A Hansen; B J Riis; K Overgaard; C Hassager; C Christiansen
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 1.713

2.  Nasal calcitonin for treatment of established osteoporosis.

Authors:  K Overgaard; B J Riis; C Christiansen; J Pødenphant; J S Johansen
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.478

Review 3.  Clinical indications for bone mass measurements. A report from the Scientific Advisory Board of the National Osteoporosis Foundation.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Bone composition in the distal forearm.

Authors:  L Nilas; H Nørgaard; J Pødenphant; A Gotfredsen; C Christiansen
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 1.713

5.  Accuracy of measurements of body composition by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in vivo.

Authors:  O L Svendsen; J Haarbo; C Hassager; C Christiansen
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  The impact of measurement errors on the diagnostic value of bone mass measurements: theoretical considerations.

Authors:  C Hassager; S B Jensen; A Gotfredsen; C Christiansen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Densitometry of the radius using single and dual energy absorptiometry.

Authors:  K G Faulkner; M R McClung; M S Schmeer; L A Roberts; K W Gaither
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Usefulness of regional bone measurements in patients with osteoporotic fractures of the spine and distal forearm.

Authors:  L Nilas; J Pødenphant; B J Riis; A Gotfredsen; C Christiansen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Long-term reproducibility of bone mineral content measurements.

Authors:  C Christiansen; P Rödbro
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 1.713

10.  Axial and appendicular bone density predict fractures in older women.

Authors:  D M Black; S R Cummings; H K Genant; M C Nevitt; L Palermo; W Browner
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  8 in total

1.  Bone mineral density measures in longitudinal studies: the choice of phantom is crucial for quality assessment. The Tromsø study, a population-based study.

Authors:  Nina Emaus; G K R Berntsen; R Joakimsen; V Fønnebø
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Comparison of bone densitometry of the phalanges, distal forearm and axial skeleton in early postmenopausal women participating in the EPIC Study.

Authors:  P Ravn; K Overgaard; C Huang; P D Ross; D Green; M McClung
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  The long-term predictive value of bone mineral density measurements for fracture risk is independent of the site of measurement and the age at diagnosis: results from the Prospective Epidemiological Risk Factors study.

Authors:  Yu Z Bagger; László B Tankó; Peter Alexandersen; Henrik B Hansen; Gerong Qin; Claus Christiansen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-10-28       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Relation of common allelic variation at vitamin D receptor locus to bone mineral density and postmenopausal bone loss: cross sectional and longitudinal population study.

Authors:  H L Jørgensen; J Schøller; J C Sand; M Bjuring; C Hassager; C Christiansen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-09-07

5.  A local agreement pattern measure based on hazard functions for survival outcomes.

Authors:  Tian Dai; Ying Guo; Limin Peng; Amita K Manatunga
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Differences in precision in bone mineral density measured by SXA and DXA: the NOREPOS study.

Authors:  Lisa Forsén; Gro K Rosvold Berntsen; Haakon E Meyer; Grethe S Tell; Vinjar Fønnebø
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 8.082

7.  Does regional loss of bone density explain low trauma distal forearm fractures in men (the Mr F study)?

Authors:  B C Hanusch; S P Tuck; R J Q McNally; J J Wu; M Prediger; J Walker; J Tang; I Piec; W D Fraser; H K Datta; R M Francis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: Pitfalls in measurement and interpretation of bone mineral density.

Authors:  M K Garg; Sandeep Kharb
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.