Literature DB >> 1782572

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry versus single photon absorptiometry of the radius.

R S Weinstein1, K D New, L J Sappington.   

Abstract

Radial diaphyseal bone mineral density (BMD) was measured at the standard one-third site by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and by 125I single photon absorptiometry (SPA) in 70 consecutive subjects, aged 12-86 years, with metabolic disorders of the skeleton. Each patient was measured once by the DEXA (Hologic QDR-1000) instrument and four times by the SPA (Norland 2780) instrument on the same day by one or the other of 2 technicians. The DEXA and SPA measurements were linearly related and highly correlated (r = 0.975, P less than 0.0001) over a range from severe osteopenia to high normal BMD. Ninety-five percent of the variation in the BMD determined by SPA was accounted for by DEXA, so that the BMD(SPA) = 1.035 +/- 0.027 (SEM) x BMD(DEXA)-0.007 +/- 0.019 (SEM). This permits continued use of previously accumulated SPA data-bases. The coefficient of variation for repeat measurements by DEXA was 1.2% and by SPA 1.6%. Examination time by DEXA was 6-7 minutes, about 45% shorter than the corresponding SPA determinations. DEXA is the superior method for evaluation of the radius, as it provides faster and more precise measurements in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1782572     DOI: 10.1007/bf02556252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  12 in total

1.  Fracture risk: a role for compact bone.

Authors:  R B Mazess
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Treatment of postmenopausal hyperparathyroidism with norethindrone. Long-term effects on forearm mineral content.

Authors:  J Wishart; M Horowitz; A Need; B Chatterton; B E Nordin
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1990-09

3.  Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for total-body and regional bone-mineral and soft-tissue composition.

Authors:  R B Mazess; H S Barden; J P Bisek; J Hanson
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 4.  Screening for osteoporosis.

Authors:  L J Melton; D M Eddy; C C Johnston
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1990-04-01       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Unequal decrease in bone density of lumbar spine and ultradistal radius in Colles' and vertebral fracture syndromes.

Authors:  R Eastell; H W Wahner; W M O'Fallon; P C Amadio; L J Melton; B L Riggs
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  In vivo measurement of bone mass. Its use in demineralized states such as osteoporosis.

Authors:  D M Smith; C C Johnston; P L Yu
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1972-01-17       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Measurement of the subcutaneous fat in the distal forearm by single photon absorptiometry.

Authors:  C Hassager; J Borg; C Christiansen
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 8.694

8.  Cross-over study of fat-corrected forearm mineral content during nandrolone decanoate therapy for osteoporosis.

Authors:  A G Need; M Horowitz; C J Walker; B E Chatterton; I C Chapman; B E Nordin
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Differential changes in bone mineral density of the appendicular and axial skeleton with aging: relationship to spinal osteoporosis.

Authors:  B L Riggs; H W Wahner; W L Dunn; R B Mazess; K P Offord; L J Melton
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 14.808

10.  Irreversible bone loss in osteomalacia. Comparison of radial photon absorptiometry with iliac bone histomorphometry during treatment.

Authors:  A M Parfitt; D S Rao; J Stanciu; A R Villanueva; M Kleerekoper; B Frame
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 14.808

View more
  7 in total

1.  Comparative assessment of bone mineral density of the forearm using single photon and dual X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  J W Nieves; F Cosman; C Mars; R Lindsay
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Correlations of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, quantitative computed tomography, and single photon absorptiometry with spinal and non-spinal fractures.

Authors:  F W Lafferty; D Y Rowland
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Geometric variables from DXA of the radius predict forearm fracture load in vitro.

Authors:  E R Myers; A T Hecker; D S Rooks; J A Hipp; W C Hayes
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 4.  A systematic review of interventions by healthcare professionals on community-dwelling postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  P Lai; S S Chua; S P Chan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Accuracy and precision study in vitro for peripheral quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  M Takada; K Engelke; S Hagiwara; S Grampp; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Densitometry of the radius using single and dual energy absorptiometry.

Authors:  K G Faulkner; M R McClung; M S Schmeer; L A Roberts; K W Gaither
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Single X-ray absorptiometry of the forearm: precision, correlation, and reference data.

Authors:  T L Kelly; G Crane; D T Baran
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.333

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.