Literature DB >> 7980803

Cancer prevention in primary care. Screening for cervical cancer.

J Austoker1.   

Abstract

Cervical screening has been shown to be effective in several countries, although not by means of randomised controlled trials. A screening programme has been in operation in the United Kingdom since 1964, but it has, in the past, been beset with problems of organisation, accountability, and commitment. The introduction in 1988 of a systematic call and recall introduction in 1988 of a systematic call and recall system and the setting up of an NHS cervical screening programme national coordinating network has brought a greater sense of coherence. Coverage of the target population in England between 1989-90 and 1992-3 increased from 61% to 83%, and there is a strong indication that cervical screening is now beginning to reach those most at risk--namely, older women from lower social classes. Primary care is central to the overall success of the cervical screening programme. General practitioners are in a unique position to invite women for a smear test, to take smears, to ensure that abnormal smear test results are followed up, and to check on reasons for non-attendance. Numerous studies have looked at the involvement of general practice in cervical screening, identifying many ways in which the programme can be improved. Many practices are now running well organised and effective programmes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7980803      PMCID: PMC2540751          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.309.6949.241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  17 in total

1.  Anxiety caused by abnormal result of cervical smear test: a controlled trial.

Authors:  C Wilkinson; J M Jones; J McBride
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-02-17

2.  Cervical cytology screening: a comparison of two call systems.

Authors:  A Wilson; A Leeming
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-07-18

3.  Evaluation of the cervical cytology screening programme in an inner city health district.

Authors:  R Beardow; J Oerton; C Victor
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-07-08

4.  A screening programme for cervical cancer that worked.

Authors:  M Hakama; K Louhivuori
Journal:  Cancer Surv       Date:  1988

5.  Investigation of non-responders at a cervical cancer screening clinic in Manchester.

Authors:  V Nathoo
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-04-09

6.  Trends in mortality from cervical cancer in the Nordic countries: association with organised screening programmes.

Authors:  E Lăără; N E Day; M Hakama
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-05-30       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Prospective randomised controlled trial of methods of call and recall for cervical cytology screening.

Authors:  M Pierce; S Lundy; A Palanisamy; S Winning; J King
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-07-15

8.  Women's preferences for sex of doctor: a postal survey.

Authors:  S Nichols
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1987-12

9.  Study of the women overdue for a smear test in a general practice cervical screening programme.

Authors:  P Meadows
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1987-11

10.  Cervical screening in an inner city area: response to a call system in general practice.

Authors:  K J Shroff; A M Corrigan; M Bosher; M P Edmonds; D Sacks; D V Coleman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-11-19
View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Screening for cervical cancer: a review of women's attitudes, knowledge, and behaviour.

Authors:  F Fylan
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Adherence to guidelines on cervical cancer screening in general practice: programme elements of successful implementation.

Authors:  R P Hermens; E Hak; M E Hulscher; J C Braspenning; R P Grol
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Comparison of human papillomavirus DNA testing and repeat Papanicolaou test in women with low-grade cervical cytologic abnormalities: a randomized trial. HPV Effectiveness in Lowgrade Paps (HELP) Study No. 1 Group.

Authors:  A Lytwyn; J W Sellors; J B Mahony; D Daya; W Chapman; N Ellis; P Roth; A T Lorincz; A Gafni
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-09-19       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Evidence-based clinical guidelines for immigrants and refugees.

Authors:  Kevin Pottie; Christina Greenaway; John Feightner; Vivian Welch; Helena Swinkels; Meb Rashid; Lavanya Narasiah; Laurence J Kirmayer; Erin Ueffing; Noni E MacDonald; Ghayda Hassan; Mary McNally; Kamran Khan; Ralf Buhrmann; Sheila Dunn; Arunmozhi Dominic; Anne E McCarthy; Anita J Gagnon; Cécile Rousseau; Peter Tugwell
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  There is no longer a place for underage cytology in genitourinary medicine clinics.

Authors:  C O'Mahony
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1996-12

6.  Withdrawing low risk women from cervical screening programmes: mathematical modelling study.

Authors:  C Sherlaw-Johnson; S Gallivan; D Jenkins
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-02-06

7.  Screening for cervical cancer. Graphs may mislead.

Authors:  C M Anderson; J G Thornton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-10-08

Review 8.  Is default from colposcopy a problem, and if so what can we do? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  H Lester; S Wilson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Effect of screening on incidence of and mortality from cancer of cervix in England: evaluation based on routinely collected statistics.

Authors:  M Quinn; P Babb; J Jones; E Allen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-04-03

10.  Randomised controlled trial of the effect of evidence based information on women's willingness to participate in cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  P Adab; T Marshall; A Rouse; B Randhawa; H Sangha; N Bhangoo
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.710

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.