Literature DB >> 2504348

Evaluation of the cervical cytology screening programme in an inner city health district.

R Beardow1, J Oerton, C Victor.   

Abstract

District health authorities have been instructed to operate a cervical cytology call and recall screening programme using the age-sex registers held by family practitioner committees. A detailed evaluation of implementation in an inner London district showed that 477 out of 687 (69%) invitation letters sent to women by the family practitioner committee were either inaccurate or inappropriate: almost half of the recorded addresses were incorrect and a further fifth of the women were not eligible for a test. Overall, 90 women had a smear, which is only 13% of the total but 43% of those found to be eligible. The findings did not differ significantly with age. The findings have major implications not only for the effectiveness of call and recall for screening for cervical cancer but also for the future development of screening for breast cancer in such areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2504348      PMCID: PMC1837137          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.299.6691.98

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  7 in total

1.  Screening: the inadequacy of population registers.

Authors:  A Bowling; B Jacobson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-03-04

2.  Trends in mortality from cervical cancer in the Nordic countries: association with organised screening programmes.

Authors:  E Lăără; N E Day; M Hakama
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-05-30       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Evaluation of screening for cervical cancer in Sweden: trends in incidence and mortality 1958-1980.

Authors:  F Pettersson; E Björkholm; I Näslund
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 7.196

4.  The effect of mass screening in Iceland, 1965-74, on the incidence and mortality of cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  G Johannesson; G Geirsson; N Day
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1978-04-15       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  A case-control study of cervical cancer screening in north east Scotland.

Authors:  J E Macgregor; S M Moss; D M Parkin; N E Day
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-05-25

6.  Cervical screening in an inner city area: response to a call system in general practice.

Authors:  K J Shroff; A M Corrigan; M Bosher; M P Edmonds; D Sacks; D V Coleman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-11-19

7.  Organisation and results of the cervical cytology screening programme in British Columbia, 1955-85.

Authors:  G H Anderson; D A Boyes; J L Benedet; J C Le Riche; J P Matisic; K C Suen; A J Worth; A Millner; O M Bennett
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-04-02
  7 in total
  22 in total

Review 1.  Screening for cervical cancer: a review of women's attitudes, knowledge, and behaviour.

Authors:  F Fylan
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Tackling health inequalities in primary care.

Authors:  L Smeeth; I Heath
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-04-17

Review 3.  Abnormal cervical smear test results: old dilemmas and new directions.

Authors:  C Wilkinson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 4.  Understanding the uptake of cervical cancer screening: the contribution of the health belief model.

Authors:  S J Gillam
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 5.  Cancer prevention in primary care. Screening for cervical cancer.

Authors:  J Austoker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-07-23

6.  Time for evidence-based screening?

Authors:  L Smeeth
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Evaluation of a call programme for cervical cytology screening.

Authors:  K J Shroff
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-08-26

8.  The heart of the white paper controversy.

Authors:  T Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-10-14

9.  Making cervical screening work.

Authors:  P Dobson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-08-05

10.  Using patient and general practice characteristics to explain variations in cervical smear uptake rates.

Authors:  F A Majeed; D G Cook; H R Anderson; S Hilton; S Bunn; C Stones
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-05-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.