Literature DB >> 2107898

Anxiety caused by abnormal result of cervical smear test: a controlled trial.

C Wilkinson1, J M Jones, J McBride.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2107898      PMCID: PMC1662255          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.300.6722.440

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

1.  Cervical smears: a questionable practice?

Authors:  J S McCormick
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-07-22       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Psychological costs of screening.

Authors:  T M Marteau
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-08-26

3.  Attendance for cervical screening--whose problem?

Authors:  A Eardley; A K Elkind; B Spencer; P Hobbs; L L Pendleton; D Haran
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.634

  3 in total
  28 in total

Review 1.  Screening for cervical cancer: a review of women's attitudes, knowledge, and behaviour.

Authors:  F Fylan
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Protagonist: population based endoscopic screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  W S Atkin; J M A Northover
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  How can we develop a cost-effective quality cervical screening programme?

Authors:  Sue Wilson; Helen Lester
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 4.  Abnormal cervical smear test results: old dilemmas and new directions.

Authors:  C Wilkinson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 5.  Interventions to improve follow-up of abnormal findings in cancer screening.

Authors:  Roshan Bastani; K Robin Yabroff; Ronald E Myers; Beth Glenn
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Referral rates for colposcopy.

Authors:  W P Soutter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-12-08

Review 7.  Understanding the uptake of cervical cancer screening: the contribution of the health belief model.

Authors:  S J Gillam
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Screening in practice: Reducing the psychological costs.

Authors:  T M Marteau
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-07-07

Review 9.  Cancer prevention in primary care. Screening for cervical cancer.

Authors:  J Austoker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-07-23

10.  Psychological impact of positive cervical cancer screening results among Japanese women.

Authors:  Yukari Isaka; Haruhiko Inada; Yuri Hiranuma; Masao Ichikawa
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.