Literature DB >> 3505643

Study of the women overdue for a smear test in a general practice cervical screening programme.

P Meadows.   

Abstract

Of the 1527 women aged 30-59 years in one general practice who were eligible for a cervical smear examination 196 (12.8%) were overdue for the test. These women were contacted randomly by post or in person to ascertain their reasons for not responding to the practice screening programme. Of 118 women contacted personally 47% had no major objection to the smear test but had a low view of its priority. A further 24% gave incorrect reasons for thinking a smear test was unnecessary while 29% had strong reasons for not wanting to attend and probably never would. Social and medical factors from the medical records were also examined and compared with those of a group of age and sex matched controls. It was found that women overdue for a smear test lived in more ;socially stressed' areas and used their general practitioner much less than the controls. The theoretical upper limit for smear uptake in the practice was calculated to be around 96%. To help achieve this we need to ensure: (1) that all women understand that the test is to detect a stage before cancer; (2) that some women receive more counselling; and (3) that promotional material is directed at the families of women at risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3505643      PMCID: PMC1711115     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract        ISSN: 0035-8797


  10 in total

1.  Cervical screening--refusal in general practice.

Authors:  C Hodes
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1972-03

2.  Mortality from carcinoma of cervix uteri in Britain.

Authors:  J E Macgregor; S Teper
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1978-10-07       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Patient preferences for cervical cytology.

Authors:  D E Cullum; J N Savory
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1983-07-30

4.  Improving the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  R Ellman; J Chamberlain
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1984-10

5.  Cervical smear histories of 500 women with invasive cervical cancer in Yorkshire.

Authors:  M E Paterson; K R Peel; C A Joslin
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-10-06

6.  Quinquennial cervical smears: every woman's right and every general practitioner's responsibility.

Authors:  P Standing; S Mercer
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-10-06

7.  Effect of cervical cancer screening in Scandinavia.

Authors:  N E Day
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  A retrospective review of cervical cytology in women developing invasive squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  E M Walker; M J Hare; P Cooper
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1983-11

9.  The effect of mass screening in Iceland, 1965-74, on the incidence and mortality of cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  G Johannesson; G Geirsson; N Day
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1978-04-15       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Screening for cervical cancer in general practice.

Authors:  M Briscoe; J O Woods
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  1984
  10 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Cancer prevention in primary care. Screening for cervical cancer.

Authors:  J Austoker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-07-23

2.  Cervical cancer screening: who is not screened and why?

Authors:  L C Harlan; A B Bernstein; L G Kessler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Assessing the effectiveness of a screening campaign: who is missed by 80% cervical screening coverage?

Authors:  S Orbell; I Crombie; A Robertson; G Johnston; M Kenicer
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Cervical screening: the optimum visit plan for contacting users and non-users in Scotland.

Authors:  I K Crombie; S Orbell; G Johnston; A J Robertson; M Kenicer
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.710

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.