Literature DB >> 3144375

Cervical screening in an inner city area: response to a call system in general practice.

K J Shroff1, A M Corrigan, M Bosher, M P Edmonds, D Sacks, D V Coleman.   

Abstract

To determine whether a cervical screening call system based in general practice in a deprived inner city area would increase the numbers of women who came forward for cervical smears the response to letters of invitation for screening was monitored for one year in one general practice in the Paddington and North Kensington district of London. Women aged 20-64 were identified from the computerised age-sex register. Only 16% of these women had had a smear test. A total of 750 call letters was sent out. Initially the response was poor (57 women; 22%), and 85 (32%) letters were returned marked "address unknown." After the age-sex register was updated the response to call was 330 women (44%). The response of women aged over 35 was better than the response of women aged 35 and under (229 (53%) v 101 (32%)). In the year of the study the number of women aged 20-64 on the revised register who had been screened rose by 330 (14%). A general practice based call system can improve uptake of cervical screening even in a highly mobile, socially underprivileged population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3144375      PMCID: PMC1834919          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.297.6659.1317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  2 in total

1.  Asbestos dust exposure during brake repair.

Authors:  K Rödelsperger; H Jahn; B Brückel; J Manke; R Paur; H J Woitowitz
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.214

2.  Benign asbestosis: words and thoughts.

Authors:  T Beritić
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1988-07
  2 in total
  14 in total

1.  Provision of, and patient satisfaction with, primary care services in a relatively affluent area and a relatively deprived area of Glasgow.

Authors:  S Wyke; G Campbell; S Maciver
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  A comparison of four cytological sampling techniques in a genitourinary medicine clinic.

Authors:  A Szarewski; J Cuzick; M Nayagam; R N Thin
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1990-12

Review 3.  Cancer prevention in primary care. Screening for cervical cancer.

Authors:  J Austoker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-07-23

4.  Working against patients?

Authors:  E Young; J Cox; G Robinson; K Knight; K Wood; J Hogan; D Plenty
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1989-04

5.  Evaluation of a call programme for cervical cytology screening.

Authors:  K J Shroff
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-08-26

6.  Evaluation of the cervical cytology screening programme in an inner city health district.

Authors:  R Beardow; J Oerton; C Victor
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-07-08

7.  Evaluation of a call programme for cervical cytology screening in women aged 50-60.

Authors:  A J Robertson; G S Reid; C A Stoker; C Bissett; N Waugh; I Fenton; J Rowan; R Halkerston
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-07-15

8.  Evaluation of a call programme for cervical cytology screening.

Authors:  N R Waugh; A J Robertson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-09-30

9.  Randomized controlled study of customized preventive medicine reminder letters in a community practice.

Authors:  W E Hogg; M Bass; N Calonge; H Crouch; G Satenstein
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  Using patient and general practice characteristics to explain variations in cervical smear uptake rates.

Authors:  F A Majeed; D G Cook; H R Anderson; S Hilton; S Bunn; C Stones
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-05-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.