Literature DB >> 3130132

Investigation of non-responders at a cervical cancer screening clinic in Manchester.

V Nathoo1.   

Abstract

Uptake of cervical cytology screening in a Manchester practice has been very low (14%) in spite of the family practitioner committee introducing a call and recall system. A questionnaire was used to investigate the attitudes of non-responders, who were all from social classes IV and V. Attendance was found to be inhibited by a high level of anxiety about the test and about cervical cancer, by erroneous beliefs, and by concurrent family difficulties. More than half the non-attendance was directly attributable to administrative errors, which resulted in appointments being sent to wrong addresses or to inappropriate people (four after hysterectomy, 10 who had had recent smears). These matters require urgent attention. Several simple measures might improve attendance at clinics, follow up of patients, and attitudes toward screening: invitations to attend the clinic, a register of patients and results, a simpler version of the leaflet, use of well known personalities to promote cervical screening, health education campaigns, and regular evaluation of records.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3130132      PMCID: PMC2545565          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.296.6628.1041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)        ISSN: 0267-0623


  4 in total

1.  Recall of women in a cervical cytology screening programme. An estimate of the true rate of response.

Authors:  C D Sansom; J MacInerney; V Oliver; J Wakefield; R Yule
Journal:  Br J Prev Soc Med       Date:  1975-06

2.  Cervical cancer. What price silence?

Authors:  A Cole
Journal:  Nurs Times       Date:  1986 Jun 11-18

3.  Survey of cervical cytology in general practice.

Authors:  B Scaife
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1972-07-22

4.  Quinquennial cervical smears: every woman's right and every general practitioner's responsibility.

Authors:  P Standing; S Mercer
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-10-06
  4 in total
  18 in total

Review 1.  Screening for cervical cancer: a review of women's attitudes, knowledge, and behaviour.

Authors:  F Fylan
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Inadequate follow-up for abnormal Pap smears in an urban population.

Authors:  Neeraja B Peterson; Jini Han; Karen M Freund
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 3.  Understanding the uptake of cervical cancer screening: the contribution of the health belief model.

Authors:  S J Gillam
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 4.  Cancer prevention in primary care. Screening for cervical cancer.

Authors:  J Austoker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-07-23

5.  Pap smear screening rates: coverage on the southern queen charlotte islands.

Authors:  B Calam; M Bass; G Deagle
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Estimating the point accuracy of population registers using capture-recapture methods in Scotland.

Authors:  M J Garton; M I Abdalla; D M Reid; I T Russell
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Screening: the inadequacy of population registers.

Authors:  A Bowling; B Jacobson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-03-04

8.  The effect on compliance of a health education leaflet in colorectal cancer screening in general practice in central England.

Authors:  A R Hart; T L Barone; S P Gay; A Inglis; L Griffin; C A Tallon; J F Mayberry
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Accuracy of cervical cytology screening.

Authors:  J R Hughes
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-05-28

10.  Anyone for tetanus?

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-10-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.