Literature DB >> 10024713

Screening for cervical cancer: a review of women's attitudes, knowledge, and behaviour.

F Fylan1.   

Abstract

The United Kingdom (UK) cervical screening programme has been successful in securing participation of a high proportion of targeted women, and has seen a fall in mortality rates of those suffering from cervical cancer. There remains, however, a significant proportion of unscreened women and, of women in whom an abnormality is detected, many will not attend for colposcopy. The present work reviews the psychological consequences of receiving an abnormal cervical smear result and of secondary screening and treatment, and examines reasons for women's non-participation in the screening programme. Psychological theories of screening behavior are used to elucidate women's reactions and to suggest methods of increasing participation, of improving the quality of the service, and of reducing women's anxiety. A literature search identified studies that examine factors influencing women's participation in the screening programme, their psychological reaction to the receipt of an abnormal cervical smear result, and experiences of colposcopy. Reasons for non-participation include administrative failures, unavailability of a female screener, inconvenient clinic times, lack of awareness of the test's indications and benefits, considering oneself not to be at risk of developing cervical cancer, and fear of embarrassment, pain, or the detection of cancer. The receipt of an abnormal result and referral for colposcopy cause high levels of distress owing to limited understanding of the meaning of the smear test; many women believe the test aims to detect existing cervical cancer. The quality of the cervical screening service can be enhanced by the provision of additional information, by improved quality of communication, and by consideration of women's health beliefs. This may result in increased participation in, and satisfaction with, the service.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10024713      PMCID: PMC1313202     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  65 in total

1.  Anxiety caused by abnormal result of cervical smear test: a controlled trial.

Authors:  C Wilkinson; J M Jones; J McBride
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-02-17

2.  International incidence rates of invasive cervical cancer after introduction of cytological screening.

Authors:  L Gustafsson; J Pontén; M Zack; H O Adami
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Case-control study of risk factors for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in young women.

Authors:  J Cuzick; A Singer; B L De Stavola; J Chomet
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Factors affecting the outcome of child psychiatric consultations.

Authors:  P O Davidson; A R Schrag
Journal:  Am J Orthopsychiatry       Date:  1969-10

5.  Cancer incidence and mortality in the European Union: cancer registry data and estimates of national incidence for 1990.

Authors:  R J Black; F Bray; J Ferlay; D M Parkin
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Enhancing adherence following abnormal Pap smears among low-income minority women: a preventive telephone counseling strategy.

Authors:  S M Miller; K K Siejak; C M Schroeder; C Lerman; E Hernandez; C W Helm
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1997-05-21       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Women's understanding of abnormal cervical smear test results: a qualitative interview study.

Authors:  A M Kavanagh; D H Broom
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-05-10

8.  Increased prevalence of abnormal Papanicolaou smears in urban adolescents.

Authors:  S A Mangan; L A Legano; C M Rosen; M T McHugh; A H Fierman; B P Dreyer; V J Palusci; B Winkler
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  1997-05

9.  Compliance behavior in women with abnormal Pap smears. Developing and testing a decision model.

Authors:  E D Paskett; W B Carter; J Chu; E White
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Preference for information and involvement, information seeking and emotional responses of women undergoing colposcopy.

Authors:  A M Barsevick; J E Johnson
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 2.228

View more
  37 in total

1.  Avoiding piecemeal research on participation in cervical cancer screening: the advantages of a social identity framework.

Authors:  Candice Tribe; Janine Webb
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Smoking cessation advice after cervical screening: a qualitative interview study of acceptability in Dutch primary care.

Authors:  Marthe Bl Mansour; Mathilde R Crone; Henk C van Weert; Niels H Chavannes; Kristel M van Asselt
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Performing Testicular Self-Examination, Driving Automobiles, and Anxiety: What Is the Logical Link?

Authors:  Michael J Rovito
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2016-02-26

4.  A social science perspective on screening for Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  B Duncan; G Hart
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.519

5.  Consistency in attitudes across cancer screenings in medically underserved minority populations.

Authors:  Susan J Shaw; James Vivian; Kathryn M Orzech; Cristina Huebner Torres; Julie Armin
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Health locus of control and assimilation of cervical cancer information in Deaf women.

Authors:  Regina Wang; Arianna A Aldridge; Vanessa L Malcarne; Sun Choe; Patricia Branz; Georgia Robins Sadler
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2010-03-06       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  "The Vagina is a Very Tricky Little Thing Down There": Cervical Health Literacy among Incarcerated Women.

Authors:  Megha Ramaswamy; Patricia J Kelly
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2015-11

8.  Determinants of womens participation in cervical cancer screening trial, Maharashtra, India.

Authors:  Bhagwan Nene; Kasturi Jayant; Silvina Arrossi; Surendra Shastri; Atul Budukh; Sanjay Hingmire; Richard Muwonge; Sylla Malvi; Ketayun Dinshaw; Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 9.408

9.  After-effects reported by women having follow-up cervical cytology tests in primary care: a cohort study within the TOMBOLA trial.

Authors:  Seonaidh Cotton; Linda Sharp; Claire Cochran; Nicola Gray; Maggie Cruickshank; Louise Smart; Alison Thornton; Julian Little
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 10.  Non-participation in population-based disease prevention programs in general practice.

Authors:  Berber Koopmans; Mark M J Nielen; François G Schellevis; Joke C Korevaar
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.