Literature DB >> 10102852

Effect of screening on incidence of and mortality from cancer of cervix in England: evaluation based on routinely collected statistics.

M Quinn1, P Babb, J Jones, E Allen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of screening on the incidence of and mortality from cervical cancer.
DESIGN: Comparison of age specific incidence and mortality before and after the introduction of the national call and recall system in 1988.
SETTING: England.
SUBJECTS: Women aged over 19 years.
RESULTS: From the mid-1960s, the number of smears taken rose continuously to 4.5 million at the end of the 1980s. Between 1988 and 1994, coverage of the target group doubled to around 85%. Registrations of in situ disease increased broadly in parallel with the numbers of smears taken. The overall incidence of invasive disease remained stable up to the end of the 1980s, although there were strong cohort effects; from 1990 incidence fell continuously and in 1995 was 35% lower than in the 1980s. The fall in overall mortality since 1950 accelerated at the end of the 1980s; there were strong cohort effects. Mortality in women under 55 was much lower in the 1990s than would have been expected.
CONCLUSIONS: The national call and recall system and incentive payments to general practitioners increased coverage to around 85%. This resulted in falls in incidence of invasive disease in all regions of England and in all age groups from 30 to 74. The falls in mortality in older women were largely unrelated to screening, but without screening there might have been 800 more deaths from cervical cancer in women under 55 in 1997.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10102852      PMCID: PMC27810          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.318.7188.904

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  20 in total

1.  Report on a Workshop of the UICC Project on Evaluation of Screening for Cancer.

Authors:  A B Miller; J Chamberlain; N E Day; M Hakama; P C Prorok
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1990-11-15       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 2.  Screening for cancer of the cervix.

Authors:  N E Day
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 3.  Screening for cancer of the cervix in elderly women.

Authors:  A Fletcher
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-01-13       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Twenty years' screening for cancer of the uterine cervix in Great Britain, 1964-84: further evidence for its ineffectiveness.

Authors:  M F Murphy; M J Campbell; P O Goldblatt
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Cancer of the cervix: a sexually transmitted infection?

Authors:  V Beral
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1974-05-25       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  The impact of screening on the incidence of cervical cancer in England and Wales.

Authors:  D M Parkin; X Nguyen-Dinh; N E Day
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1985-02

7.  Invasive cervical cancer in Southampton and South West Hampshire: effect of introducing a comprehensive screening programme.

Authors:  A Herbert; C Breen; T N Bryant; A Hitchcock; H Macdonald; G H Millward-Sadler; J Smith
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.136

8.  Risk targeting in cervical screening: a new look at an old problem.

Authors:  C E Wilkinson; T J Peters; I M Harvey; N C Stott
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Analysis of trends in cancer mortality in England and Wales during 1951-80 separating changes associated with period of birth and period of death.

Authors:  C Osmond; M J Gardner; E D Acheson
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1982-04-03

10.  Trends in cervical cancer and carcinoma in situ in Great Britain.

Authors:  G A Cook; G J Draper
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  98 in total

1.  Screening and mortality from cervical cancer. Does screening really reduce mortality?

Authors:  J S Vaidya; M Baum
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-04

2.  Time trends in incidence of cervical cancer in Lithuania from 1983 to 1997.

Authors:  R Didziapetris; M Stukonis; J Kurtinaitis
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Cervical cancer: the increasing incidence of adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma in younger women.

Authors:  S Liu; R Semenciw; Y Mao
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-04-17       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Pleasing both authors and readers. A combination of short print articles and longer electronic ones may help us do this.

Authors:  T Delamothe; M Müllner; R Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-04-03

Review 5.  Cancer screening.

Authors:  A Barratt; P Mannes; L Irwig; L Trevena; J Craig; L Rychetnik
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 6.  How can we develop a cost-effective quality cervical screening programme?

Authors:  Sue Wilson; Helen Lester
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Cervical cancer mortality by neighbourhood income in urban Canada from 1971 to 1996.

Authors:  Edward Ng; Russell Wilkins; Michael Fung Kee Fung; Jean-Marie Berthelot
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-05-11       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Cervical screening.

Authors:  Angela E Raffle
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-05-29

9.  Evidence-based clinical guidelines for immigrants and refugees.

Authors:  Kevin Pottie; Christina Greenaway; John Feightner; Vivian Welch; Helena Swinkels; Meb Rashid; Lavanya Narasiah; Laurence J Kirmayer; Erin Ueffing; Noni E MacDonald; Ghayda Hassan; Mary McNally; Kamran Khan; Ralf Buhrmann; Sheila Dunn; Arunmozhi Dominic; Anne E McCarthy; Anita J Gagnon; Cécile Rousseau; Peter Tugwell
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Is there any ideal of 'high quality care' opposing 'low quality care'? A deconstructionist reading.

Authors:  Stephen Buetow; Peter Adams
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2006-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.