Literature DB >> 7738511

Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge.

R D Easton1, M J Sholl.   

Abstract

Experiments are reported that assessed the ability of people, without vision, to locate the positions of objects from imagined points of observation that are related to their actual position by rotational or translational components. Theoretical issues addressed were whether spatial relations stored in an object-to-object system are directly retrieved or whether retrieval is mediated by a body-centered coordinate system, and whether body-centered access involves a process of imaging updating of self-position. The results, with those of Rieser (1989), indicate that in the case of regularly structured object arrays, interobject relations are directly retrieved for the translation task, but for the rotation task, retrieval occurs by means of a body-centered coordinate system, requiring imagined body rotation. For irregularly structured arrays, access of interobject spatial structure occurs by means of a body-centered coordinate system for both translation and rotation tasks, requiring imagined body translation or rotation. Array regularity affected retrieval of spatial structure in terms of global shape of interobject relations and local object position within global shape.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7738511     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.21.2.483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  53 in total

1.  A dissociation between object manipulation spatial ability and spatial orientation ability.

Authors:  M Kozhevnikov; M Hegarty
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-07

2.  Updating space during imagined self- and array translations.

Authors:  Sarah H Creem-Regehr
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-09

3.  Spatial representation by young infants: categorization of spatial relations or sensitivity to a crossing primitive?

Authors:  Paul C Quinn
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-07

4.  Visual and haptic representations of scenes are updated with observer movement.

Authors:  Achille Pasqualotto; Ciara M Finucane; Fiona N Newell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-21       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Transient and enduring spatial representations under disorientation and self-rotation.

Authors:  David Waller; Eric Hodgson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Imaginal repositioning in everyday environments: effects of testing method and setting.

Authors:  Mark May
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-09-07

7.  The role of body-based sensory information in the acquisition of enduring spatial representations.

Authors:  David Waller; Nathan Greenauer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-09-05

8.  Egocentric and nonegocentric coding in memory for spatial layout: evidence from scene recognition.

Authors:  David Waller
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-04

9.  Spatial updating in virtual reality: the sufficiency of visual information.

Authors:  Bernhard E Riecke; Douglas W Cunningham; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-09-23

10.  Isolating observer-based reference directions in human spatial memory: head, body, and the self-to-array axis.

Authors:  David Waller; Yvonne Lippa; Adam Richardson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-02-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.