Literature DB >> 17316594

Isolating observer-based reference directions in human spatial memory: head, body, and the self-to-array axis.

David Waller1, Yvonne Lippa, Adam Richardson.   

Abstract

Several lines of research have suggested the importance of egocentric reference systems for determining how the spatial properties of one's environment are mentally organized. Yet relatively little is known about the bases for egocentric reference systems in human spatial memory. In three experiments, we examine the relative importance of observer-based reference directions in human memory by controlling the orientation of head and body during acquisition. Experiment 1 suggests that spatial memory is organized by a head-aligned reference direction; however, Experiment 2 shows that a body-aligned reference direction can be more influential than a head-aligned direction when the axis defined by the relative positions of the observer and the learned environment (the "self-to-array" axis) is properly controlled. A third experiment shows that the self-to-array axis is distinct from - and can dominate - retina, head, and body-based egocentric reference systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17316594      PMCID: PMC2167632          DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  34 in total

1.  Attenuation of alignment effect with exocentric encoding of location.

Authors:  Y A Féry; R Magnac
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Orientation specificity and spatial updating of memories for layouts.

Authors:  David Waller; Daniel R Montello; Anthony E Richardson; Mary Hegarty
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Unilateral neglect of representational space.

Authors:  E Bisiach; C Luzzatti
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  Categories and particulars: prototype effects in estimating spatial location.

Authors:  J Huttenlocher; L V Hedges; S Duncan
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 5.  Action-oriented spatial reference frames in cortex.

Authors:  C L Colby
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Visual memories from nonvisual experiences.

Authors:  A L Shelton; T P McNamara
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-07

7.  Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge.

Authors:  R D Easton; M J Sholl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Frames of reference in vision and language: where is above?

Authors:  L A Carlson-Radvansky; D E Irwin
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1993-03

9.  Orientation in cognitive maps.

Authors:  D L Hintzman; C S O'Dell; D R Arndt
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Updating after rotational and translational body movements: coordinate structure of perspective space.

Authors:  C C Presson; D R Montello
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  6 in total

1.  Integrating spatial information across experiences.

Authors:  Nathan Greenauer; Catherine Mello; Jonathan W Kelly; Marios N Avraamides
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-09-01

2.  Where you are affects what you can easily imagine: Environmental geometry elicits sensorimotor interference in remote perspective taking.

Authors:  Bernhard E Riecke; Timothy P McNamara
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2017-08-09

3.  Functional equivalence of spatial images from touch and vision: evidence from spatial updating in blind and sighted individuals.

Authors:  Nicholas A Giudice; Maryann R Betty; Jack M Loomis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Spatial updating according to a fixed reference direction of a briefly viewed layout.

Authors:  Hui Zhang; Weimin Mou; Timothy P McNamara
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2011-06

5.  Not all memories are the same: Situational context influences spatial recall within one's city of residency.

Authors:  Tobias Meilinger; Julia Frankenstein; Nadine Simon; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Jean-Pierre Bresciani
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-02

6.  Reference frames in virtual spatial navigation are viewpoint dependent.

Authors:  Agoston Török; T Peter Nguyen; Orsolya Kolozsvári; Robert J Buchanan; Zoltan Nadasdy
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 3.169

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.