Literature DB >> 16933759

Egocentric and nonegocentric coding in memory for spatial layout: evidence from scene recognition.

David Waller1.   

Abstract

Much contemporary research has suggested that memories for spatial layout are stored with a preferred orientation. The present research examined whether spatial memories are also stored with a preferred viewpoint position. Participants viewed images of an arrangement of objects taken from a single viewpoint and subsequently were tested on their ability to recognize the arrangement from novel viewpoints that had been translated in either the lateral or the depth dimension. Lateral and forward displacements of the viewpoint resulted in increasing response latencies and errors. Backward displacement showed no such effect, nor did lateral translation that resulted in a centered "canonical" view of the arrangement. These results further constrain the specificity of spatial memory, while also providing some evidence that nonegocentric spatial information is coded in memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16933759      PMCID: PMC1557688          DOI: 10.3758/bf03193573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  31 in total

1.  Orientation-specific effects in picture matching and naming.

Authors:  J E Murray
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-09

2.  Viewpoint-dependent recognition of scenes.

Authors:  Chie Nakatani; Alexander Pollatsek; Scott H Johnson
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2002-01

3.  Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition.

Authors:  H H Bülthoff; S Edelman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-01-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

5.  Effects of perceiving and imagining scenes on memory for pictures.

Authors:  H Intraub; C V Gottesman; A J Bills
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Switching imagined viewpoints: the effects of viewing angle and layout size.

Authors:  Michael Tlauka
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2002-05

7.  Cognitive mapping: knowledge of real-world distance and location information.

Authors:  G W Evans; K Pezdek
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-01

8.  Determinants of eye-fixation duration.

Authors:  T A Salthouse; C L Ellis
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1980-06

9.  Spatial memory and perspective taking.

Authors:  Amy L Shelton; Timothy P McNamara
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-04

10.  Updating after rotational and translational body movements: coordinate structure of perspective space.

Authors:  C C Presson; D R Montello
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  8 in total

1.  From maps to navigation: the role of cues in finding locations in a virtual environment.

Authors:  Adam T Hutcheson; Douglas H Wedell
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-08

2.  A body-centred frame of reference drives spatial priming in visual search.

Authors:  Keira Ball; Daniel Smith; Amanda Ellison; Thomas Schenk
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Isolating observer-based reference directions in human spatial memory: head, body, and the self-to-array axis.

Authors:  David Waller; Yvonne Lippa; Adam Richardson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-02-20

4.  Implicit learning of viewpoint-independent spatial layouts.

Authors:  Taiga Tsuchiai; Kazumichi Matsumiya; Ichiro Kuriki; Satoshi Shioiri
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-06-26

5.  On the contribution of binocular disparity to the long-term memory for natural scenes.

Authors:  Matteo Valsecchi; Karl R Gegenfurtner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Perspective taking and systematic biases in object location memory.

Authors:  Vladislava Segen; Giorgio Colombo; Marios Avraamides; Timothy Slattery; Jan M Wiener
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Age-related differences in visual encoding and response strategies contribute to spatial memory deficits.

Authors:  Vladislava Segen; Marios N Avraamides; Timothy J Slattery; Jan M Wiener
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-02

8.  Age-related changes in visual encoding strategy preferences during a spatial memory task.

Authors:  Vladislava Segen; Marios N Avraamides; Timothy J Slattery; Jan M Wiener
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-03-23
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.