Literature DB >> 17024431

Spatial updating in virtual reality: the sufficiency of visual information.

Bernhard E Riecke1, Douglas W Cunningham, Heinrich H Bülthoff.   

Abstract

Robust and effortless spatial orientation critically relies on "automatic and obligatory spatial updating", a largely automatized and reflex-like process that transforms our mental egocentric representation of the immediate surroundings during ego-motions. A rapid pointing paradigm was used to assess automatic/obligatory spatial updating after visually displayed upright rotations with or without concomitant physical rotations using a motion platform. Visual stimuli displaying a natural, subject-known scene proved sufficient for enabling automatic and obligatory spatial updating, irrespective of concurrent physical motions. This challenges the prevailing notion that visual cues alone are insufficient for enabling such spatial updating of rotations, and that vestibular/proprioceptive cues are both required and sufficient. Displaying optic flow devoid of landmarks during the motion and pointing phase was insufficient for enabling automatic spatial updating, but could not be entirely ignored either. Interestingly, additional physical motion cues hardly improved performance, and were insufficient for affording automatic spatial updating. The results are discussed in the context of the mental transformation hypothesis and the sensorimotor interference hypothesis, which associates difficulties in imagined perspective switches to interference between the sensorimotor and cognitive (to-be-imagined) perspective.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17024431     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-006-0085-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  34 in total

1.  The use of optical velocities for distance discrimination and reproduction during visually simulated self motion.

Authors:  F Bremmer; M Lappe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Active and passive scene recognition across views.

Authors:  R F Wang; D J Simons
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1999-03-01

3.  Allocentric coding of object-to-object relations in overlearned and novel environments.

Authors:  Melinda C Holmes; M Jeanne Sholl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Updating displays after imagined object and viewer rotations.

Authors:  M Wraga; S H Creem; D R Proffitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects.

Authors:  R N Shepard; J Metzler
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-02-19       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Mental representations of spatial relations.

Authors:  T P McNamara
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge.

Authors:  R D Easton; M J Sholl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Distortions in judged spatial relations.

Authors:  A Stevens; P Coupe
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Orientation in cognitive maps.

Authors:  D L Hintzman; C S O'Dell; D R Arndt
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Updating after rotational and translational body movements: coordinate structure of perspective space.

Authors:  C C Presson; D R Montello
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  18 in total

1.  Are allocentric spatial reference frames compatible with theories of Enactivism?

Authors:  Sabine U König; Caspar Goeke; Tobias Meilinger; Peter König
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-08-02

Review 2.  Active and passive contributions to spatial learning.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Chrastil; William H Warren
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-02

3.  Multisensory integration in the estimation of walked distances.

Authors:  Jennifer L Campos; John S Butler; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Perceptual scaling of visual and inertial cues: effects of field of view, image size, depth cues, and degree of freedom.

Authors:  B J Correia Grácio; J E Bos; M M van Paassen; M Mulder
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Consciousness as recursive, spatiotemporal self-location.

Authors:  Frederic Peters
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-09-10

6.  Persistent perceptual delay for active head movement onset relative to sound onset with and without vision.

Authors:  William Chung; Michael Barnett-Cowan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Moving through virtual reality without moving?

Authors:  Bernhard E Riecke; Salvar Sigurdarson; Andrew P Milne
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-08

8.  Where you are affects what you can easily imagine: Environmental geometry elicits sensorimotor interference in remote perspective taking.

Authors:  Bernhard E Riecke; Timothy P McNamara
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2017-08-09

9.  Using virtual reality to assess dynamic self-motion and landmark cues for spatial updating in children and adults.

Authors:  Erica M Barhorst-Cates; Jessica Stoker; Jeanine K Stefanucci; Sarah H Creem-Regehr
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-10-27

10.  How vision and movement combine in the hippocampal place code.

Authors:  Guifen Chen; John A King; Neil Burgess; John O'Keefe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.