Literature DB >> 16822154

Transient and enduring spatial representations under disorientation and self-rotation.

David Waller1, Eric Hodgson.   

Abstract

Current theories of environmental cognition typically differentiate between an online, transient, and dynamic system of spatial representation and an offline and enduring system of memory representation. Here the authors present additional evidence for such 2-system theories in the context of the disorientation paradigm introduced by R. F. Wang and E. S. Spelke (2000). Several experiments replicate the finding that disorientation results in a decrease in the precision of people's estimates of relative directions. In contrast to the typical interpretation of this effect as indicating the primacy of a transient spatial system, the present results are generally more consistent with an interpretation of it as indicating a switch from a relatively precise online representation to a relatively coarse enduring one. Further experiments examine the relative precision of transient and enduring representations and show that switching between them does not require disorientation, but can also be produced by self-rotations as small as 135 degrees . Copyright 2006 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16822154      PMCID: PMC1501085          DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.867

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  35 in total

1.  Estimation of self-turning in the dark: comparison between active and passive rotation.

Authors:  R Jürgens; T Boss; W Becker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Orientation specificity and spatial updating of memories for layouts.

Authors:  David Waller; Daniel R Montello; Anthony E Richardson; Mary Hegarty
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Allocentric coding of object-to-object relations in overlearned and novel environments.

Authors:  Melinda C Holmes; M Jeanne Sholl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Cognitive maps in rats and men.

Authors:  E C TOLMAN
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1948-07       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Categories and particulars: prototype effects in estimating spatial location.

Authors:  J Huttenlocher; L V Hedges; S Duncan
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation.

Authors:  J J Rieser
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Discovering functionally independent mental processes: the principle of reversed association.

Authors:  J C Dunn; K Kirsner
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge.

Authors:  R D Easton; M J Sholl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Human navigation in nested environments.

Authors:  Ranxiao Frances Wang; James R Brockmole
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Updating after rotational and translational body movements: coordinate structure of perspective space.

Authors:  C C Presson; D R Montello
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  60 in total

1.  Are allocentric spatial reference frames compatible with theories of Enactivism?

Authors:  Sabine U König; Caspar Goeke; Tobias Meilinger; Peter König
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-08-02

Review 2.  Building a cognitive map by assembling multiple path integration systems.

Authors:  Ranxiao Frances Wang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-06

3.  The role of body-based sensory information in the acquisition of enduring spatial representations.

Authors:  David Waller; Nathan Greenauer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-09-05

4.  Isolating observer-based reference directions in human spatial memory: head, body, and the self-to-array axis.

Authors:  David Waller; Yvonne Lippa; Adam Richardson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-02-20

Review 5.  Multiple systems of spatial memory and action.

Authors:  Marios N Avraamides; Jonathan W Kelly
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2007-09-27

6.  Selective influence of prior allocentric knowledge on the kinesthetic learning of a path.

Authors:  Matthieu Lafon; Manuel Vidal; Alain Berthoz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Theories of spatial representations and reference frames: what can configuration errors tell us?

Authors:  Ranxiao Frances Wang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-08

Review 8.  Vision and the representation of the surroundings in spatial memory.

Authors:  Benjamin W Tatler; Michael F Land
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 9.  Multiple reference frames used by the human brain for spatial perception and memory.

Authors:  Gaspare Galati; Gina Pelle; Alain Berthoz; Giorgia Committeri
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Cognitive cladistics and cultural override in Hominid spatial cognition.

Authors:  Daniel B M Haun; Christian J Rapold; Josep Call; Gabriele Janzen; Stephen C Levinson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.