Literature DB >> 15552361

Spatial representation by young infants: categorization of spatial relations or sensitivity to a crossing primitive?

Paul C Quinn1.   

Abstract

The spatial representation abilities of 3- to 4-month-old infants were examined in four experiments. Experiments 1 and 2 showed that infants familiarized with a diamond appearing in distinct locations to the left or right of a vertical bar subsequently preferred a stimulus depicting the diamond on the opposite side of the bar over a stimulus depicting the diamond in a novel location on the same side of the bar. Experiment 3 was a replication of Experiment 1, except that the bar was oriented at 45 degrees. In this instance, infants divided their attention between the stimulus depicting the diamond on the opposite side of the bar and the stimulus depicting the diamond in a novel location on the same side of the bar. Experiment 4 demonstrated that the results of Experiment 3 were not a consequence of a failure to process the diagonal bar. When considered with previous reports that infants can represent the categories of above and below (Quinn, 1994), the present results suggest that (1) infants can also represent the categories of left and right, and (2) performance cannot be interpreted as a response to an arbitrary crossing of one object relative to another. Although recent discussions of the relation between language and cognition have pointed to the ways in which spatial language influences spatial cognition (Bowerman & Levinson, 2001), the present findings are consistent with an influence in the opposite direction: Spatial cognition may in some instances shape spatial language.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15552361     DOI: 10.3758/bf03195874

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  20 in total

1.  Linguistic and non-linguistic spatial categorization.

Authors:  L E Crawford; T Regier; J Huttenlocher
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2000-06-15

2.  Two memories for geographical slant: separation and interdependence of action and awareness.

Authors:  S H Creem; D R Proffitt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1998-03

3.  Grounding spatial language in perception: an empirical and computational investigation.

Authors:  T Regier; L A Carlson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2001-06

4.  Categories and particulars: prototype effects in estimating spatial location.

Authors:  J Huttenlocher; L V Hedges; S Duncan
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge.

Authors:  R D Easton; M J Sholl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Place versus response as the basis of spatial errors made by young infants.

Authors:  J G Bremner; P E Bryant
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1977-02

7.  Sources of flexibility in human cognition: dual-task studies of space and language.

Authors:  L Hermer-Vazquez; E S Spelke; A S Katsnelson
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Infants' knowledge about occlusion and containment events: a surprising discrepancy.

Authors:  S J Hespos; R Baillargeon
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-03

9.  Infants' metaphysics: the case of numerical identity.

Authors:  F Xu; S Carey
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Six-month-old infants' categorization of containment spatial relations.

Authors:  Marianella Casasola; Leslie B Cohen; Elizabeth Chiarello
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2003 May-Jun
View more
  1 in total

1.  Evidence for mental subdivision of space by infants: 3- to 4-month-olds spontaneously bisect a small-scale area into left and right categories.

Authors:  Paul C Quinn
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.