Literature DB >> 16034564

Visual and haptic representations of scenes are updated with observer movement.

Achille Pasqualotto1, Ciara M Finucane, Fiona N Newell.   

Abstract

Scene recognition has been found to be sensitive to the orientation of the scene with respect to the stationary observer. Recent studies have shown, however, that observer movement can compensate for changes in visual scene orientation, through a process of spatial updating. Here we investigated whether spatial updating in scene recognition is affected by the encoding or learning modality by examining whether observer movement can also compensate for orientation changes in haptic scene recognition. In experiment 1, we replicated previously reported effects of observer movement on visual scene recognition. In experiment 2, we used the same apparatus as in experiment 1 but here participants were required to learn and recognize the scenes using touch alone. We found a cost in recognition performance with changes in scene orientation relative to the stationary observer. However, when participants could move around the scene to recognize the new orientation, then this cost in recognition performance disappeared. Thus, we found that spatial updating applies to recognition in both the visual and haptic modalities, both of which intrinsically encode the spatial properties of a scene.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16034564     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-2388-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  25 in total

1.  Path completion after haptic exploration without vision: implications for haptic spatial representations.

Authors:  R L Klatzky
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-02

2.  Viewpoint-dependent recognition of scenes.

Authors:  Chie Nakatani; Alexander Pollatsek; Scott H Johnson
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2002-01

3.  The Müller-Lyer illusion in touch and vision: implications for multisensory processes.

Authors:  Susanna Millar; Zainab Al-Attar
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-04

4.  Active and passive scene recognition across views.

Authors:  R F Wang; D J Simons
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1999-03-01

5.  Spatial updating in blind and sighted people.

Authors:  M Hollins; E K Kelley
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-04

6.  Misaligned maps lead to predictable errors.

Authors:  M J Rossano; D H Warren
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Spatial and movement-based heuristics for encoding pattern information through touch.

Authors:  S J Lederman; R L Klatzky; P O Barber
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1985-03

8.  Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge.

Authors:  R D Easton; M J Sholl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Between reality and imagination: when is spatial updating automatic?

Authors:  Ranxiao Frances Wang
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-01

10.  Imagery, action, and young children's spatial orientation: it's not being there that counts, it's what one has in mind.

Authors:  J J Rieser; A E Garing; M F Young
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1994-10
View more
  12 in total

1.  Visual, haptic and bimodal scene perception: evidence for a unitary representation.

Authors:  Helene Intraub; Frank Morelli; Kristin M Gagnier
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-02-25

2.  Spatial working memory for locations specified by vision and audition: testing the amodality hypothesis.

Authors:  Jack M Loomis; Roberta L Klatzky; Brendan McHugh; Nicholas A Giudice
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Functional equivalence of spatial images from touch and vision: evidence from spatial updating in blind and sighted individuals.

Authors:  Nicholas A Giudice; Maryann R Betty; Jack M Loomis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Perception of 3-D location based on vision, touch, and extended touch.

Authors:  Nicholas A Giudice; Roberta L Klatzky; Christopher R Bennett; Jack M Loomis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Contextual cueing: implicit memory of tactile context facilitates tactile search.

Authors:  Leonardo Assumpção; Zhuanghua Shi; Xuelian Zang; Hermann J Müller; Thomas Geyer
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  A multisensory approach to spatial updating: the case of mental rotations.

Authors:  Manuel Vidal; Alexandre Lehmann; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Cross-modal object recognition is viewpoint-independent.

Authors:  Simon Lacey; Andrew Peters; K Sathian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Visuo-haptic multisensory object recognition, categorization, and representation.

Authors:  Simon Lacey; K Sathian
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-17

9.  Sensory Substitution: The Spatial Updating of Auditory Scenes "Mimics" the Spatial Updating of Visual Scenes.

Authors:  Achille Pasqualotto; Tayfun Esenkaya
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  Characteristics of Haptic Peripersonal Spatial Representation of Object Relations.

Authors:  Ryo Wako; Saho Ayabe-Kanamura
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.