Literature DB >> 11531229

A dissociation between object manipulation spatial ability and spatial orientation ability.

M Kozhevnikov1, M Hegarty.   

Abstract

We developed psychometric tests of spatial orientation ability, in which people are shown a two-dimensional array of objects, imagine taking a perspective within the array, and indicate the direction to a target object from this perspective. Patterns of errors on these tests were consistent with experimental studies of perspective taking. Characteristic errors and verbal protocols supported the validity of the perspective-taking tests, suggesting that people encoded the objects in the display with respect to a body-centered coordinate system when the imagined perspective was more than 90 degrees different from the orientation of the display. By comparing alternative models in a confirmatory factor analysis, we found that the ability to mentally rotate and manipulate an imagined object (as measured by tests of spatial visualization and spatial relations) and the ability to reorient the imagined self (as measured by the perspective-taking tests) are separable spatial abilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11531229     DOI: 10.3758/bf03200477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  9 in total

1.  Mental representations of perspective and spatial relations from diagrams and models.

Authors:  D J Bryant; B Tversky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation.

Authors:  J J Rieser
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Updating displays after imagined object and viewer rotations.

Authors:  M Wraga; S H Creem; D R Proffitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 4.  Human spatial abilities: psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neurological influences.

Authors:  M G McGee
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  The coding and transformation of spatial information.

Authors:  J Huttenlocher; C C Presson
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge.

Authors:  R D Easton; M J Sholl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Orientation in cognitive maps.

Authors:  D L Hintzman; C S O'Dell; D R Arndt
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Imagined transformations of bodies: an fMRI investigation.

Authors:  J Zacks; B Rypma; J D Gabrieli; B Tversky; G H Glover
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Personality correlates of sense of direction and geographical orientation.

Authors:  K J Bryant
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1982-12
  9 in total
  63 in total

1.  Enhancing visuospatial performance through video game training to increase learning in visuospatial science domains.

Authors:  Christopher A Sanchez
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-02

2.  The role of practice and strategy in mental rotation training: transfer and maintenance effects.

Authors:  Chiara Meneghetti; Ramona Cardillo; Irene C Mammarella; Sara Caviola; Erika Borella
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-02-10

3.  For the mind's eye the world is two-dimensional.

Authors:  Janek S Lobmaier; Fred W Mast; Heiko Hecht
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-02

4.  Linguistic asymmetry, egocentric anchoring, and sensory modality as factors for the observed association between time and space perception.

Authors:  Eunice E Hang Choy; Him Cheung
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2017-05-17

5.  How would you describe a familiar route or put in order the landmarks along it? It depends on your cognitive style!

Authors:  Alessia Bocchi; Marco Giancola; Laura Piccardi; Massimiliano Palmiero; Raffaella Nori; Simonetta D'Amico
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  On the relation between spontaneous perspective taking and other visuospatial processes.

Authors:  Jan Zwickel; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-05

7.  Map learning and the alignment effect in young and older adults: how do they gain from having a map available while performing pointing tasks?

Authors:  Erika Borella; Chiara Meneghetti; Veronica Muffato; Rossana De Beni
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-02-09

8.  How directions of route descriptions influence orientation specificity: the contribution of spatial abilities.

Authors:  Chiara Meneghetti; Veronica Muffato; Diego Varotto; Rossana De Beni
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-02-22

9.  Restructuring the navigational field: individual predisposition towards field independence predicts preferred navigational strategy.

Authors:  Maddalena Boccia; Laura Piccardi; Adele D'Alessandro; Raffaella Nori; Cecilia Guariglia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Verbalizing, visualizing, and navigating: The effect of strategies on encoding a large-scale virtual environment.

Authors:  David J M Kraemer; Victor R Schinazi; Philip B Cawkwell; Anand Tekriwal; Russell A Epstein; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.