Literature DB >> 2747759

Socioeconomic differences in rates of cesarean section.

J B Gould1, B Davey, R S Stafford.   

Abstract

Increasing cesarean-section rates have focused attention on variations in the use of this procedure that appear to be independent of medical indication. We investigated the relation between the rate of primary cesarean section and socioeconomic status in a cohort of 245,854 singleton infants born to non-Hispanic white, black, Asian-American, and Mexican-American residents of Los Angeles County, California. On the basis of birth-certificate data for 1982 and 1983, a significant relation, independent of maternal age, parity, or birth weight, was found between the rates of primary cesarean section and socioeconomic status. Women who lived in census tracts with a median family income of more than $30,000 had a primary cesarean-section rate of 22.9 percent, as compared with 13.2 percent among women residing in areas with a median family income under $11,000. In women between the ages of 18 and 34, the incidence of reported complications of pregnancy or childbirth in the lowest-income group was 10.9 percent, as compared with 17.4 percent in the highest-income group (accounting for 42 percent of the difference in the rate of primary cesarean section between groups); the rate of primary cesarean section in the presence of complications in these two groups was 65.4 percent and 79.3 percent (accounting for 17 percent of the difference); and the primary rate in the absence of reported complications in these two groups was 6.4 percent and 10.5 percent (accounting for 41 percent of the difference). The rates of primary cesarean section were highest among non-Hispanic whites (20.6 percent), intermediate among Asian Americans (19.2 percent) and blacks (18.9 percent), and lowest among Mexican Americans (13.9 percent). Significant socioeconomic differences in these rates were observed in all four groups (P less than 0.01). We conclude that the rates of primary cesarean section vary directly with socioeconomic status and that this association cannot be accounted for by differences in maternal age, parity, birth weight, race, ethnic group, or complications of pregnancy or childbirth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2747759     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198907273210406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  41 in total

1.  Rates and implications of caesarean sections in Latin America: ecological study.

Authors:  J M Belizán; F Althabe; F C Barros; S Alexander
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-11-27

2.  Provider distribution and variations in statewide cesarean section rates.

Authors:  W J Hueston; S Lewis-Stevenson
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2001-02

3.  Beyond the simple economics of cesarean section birthing: women's resistance to social inequality.

Authors:  Dominique P Béhague
Journal:  Cult Med Psychiatry       Date:  2002-12

4.  Social predictors of caesarean section births in Italy.

Authors:  Mastaki J Kambale
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 0.927

5.  Recent trends in cesarean section use in California.

Authors:  R S Stafford
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1990-11

6.  Explaining source of payment differences in U.S. cesarean rates: why do privately insured mothers receive more cesareans than mothers who are not privately insured?

Authors:  Darren Grant
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2005-02

7.  Cesarean section rates in Italy by hospital payment mode: an analysis based on birth certificates.

Authors:  R Bertollini; D DiLallo; T Spadea; C Perucci
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Perinatal disparities for black mothers and their newborns.

Authors:  Ian M Paul; Erik B Lehman; Alawia K Suliman; Marianne M Hillemeier
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2007-08-22

9.  What is the optimal caesarean section rate? An outcome based study of existing variation.

Authors:  M Joffe; J Chapple; C Paterson; R W Beard
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Maternal and Perinatal Exposures Are Associated With Risk for Pediatric-Onset Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Jennifer S Graves; Tanuja Chitnis; Bianca Weinstock-Guttman; Jennifer Rubin; Aaron S Zelikovitch; Bardia Nourbakhsh; Timothy Simmons; Michael Waltz; T Charles Casper; Emmanuelle Waubant
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 7.124

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.