Literature DB >> 9663160

Differences in the effect of patients' socioeconomic status on the use of invasive cardiovascular procedures across health insurance categories.

D M Carlisle1, B D Leake.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the effect of patients' socioeconomic status on use of coronary angiography, bypass grafting, and angioplasty across health insurance categories.
METHODS: Multiple logistic regression was used to compute the odds of receiving each procedure among 206 233 ischemic heart disease patients residing in urban California zip codes from 1991 through 1993.
RESULTS: Residents of high socioeconomic status areas were more likely (odds ratios [ORs] = 1.20-1.41) and residents of low socioeconomic status areas were less likely (ORs = 0.79-0.84) than residents of middle socioeconomic status areas to undergo each procedure. These effects were common among Medicare and health maintenance organization patients and uncommon for privately insured and uninsured patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The effect of socioeconomic status varies across health insurance categories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9663160      PMCID: PMC1508262          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.88.7.1089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  24 in total

1.  Consumer satisfaction with prepaid group practice: a comparative study.

Authors:  R Tessler; D Mechanic
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1975-03

2.  Racial and ethnic disparities in the use of cardiovascular procedures: associations with type of health insurance.

Authors:  D M Carlisle; B D Leake; M F Shapiro
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Racial and ethnic differences in the use of invasive cardiac procedures among cardiac patients in Los Angeles County, 1986 through 1988.

Authors:  D M Carlisle; B D Leake; M F Shapiro
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Paying medical bills in the United States. Why health insurance isn't enough.

Authors:  R J Blendon; K Donelan; C A Hill; W Carter; D Beatrice; D Altman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994 Mar 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Social class differences in utilization of pediatric services in a prepaid direct service medical care program.

Authors:  R L Nolan; J L Schwartz; K Simonian
Journal:  Am J Public Health Nations Health       Date:  1967-01

6.  Effects of race and income on mortality and use of services among Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  M E Gornick; P W Eggers; T W Reilly; R M Mentnech; L K Fitterman; L E Kucken; B C Vladeck
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-09-12       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Variations in use of cardiology services in a health authority: comparison of coronary artery revascularisation rates with prevalence of angina and coronary mortality.

Authors:  N Payne; C Saul
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-01-25

8.  Differences in 4-year health outcomes for elderly and poor, chronically ill patients treated in HMO and fee-for-service systems. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study.

Authors:  J E Ware; M S Bayliss; W H Rogers; M Kosinski; A R Tarlov
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-10-02       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Racial variation in cardiac procedure use and survival following acute myocardial infarction in the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Authors:  E D Peterson; S M Wright; J Daley; G E Thibault
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-04-20       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Racial/ethnic differences in the likelihood of cesarean delivery, California.

Authors:  P Braveman; S Egerter; F Edmonston; M Verdon
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 9.308

View more
  7 in total

1.  The contribution of insurance coverage and community resources to reducing racial/ethnic disparities in access to care.

Authors:  J Lee Hargraves; Jack Hadley
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Time for a new budget allocation model for hospital care in Stockholm?

Authors:  Per-Åke Andersson; Daniel Bruce; Anders Walander; Inga Viberg
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2010-10-13

3.  Inequalities in coronary revascularisation during the 1990s: evidence from the British regional heart study.

Authors:  R W Morris; P H Whincup; O Papacosta; M Walker; A Thomson
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Ethnic differences in invasive management of coronary disease: prospective cohort study of patients undergoing angiography.

Authors:  Gene Feder; Angela M Crook; Patrick Magee; Shrilla Banerjee; Adam D Timmis; Harry Hemingway
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-02

5.  Insurance type and sepsis-associated hospitalizations and sepsis-associated mortality among US adults: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  James M O'Brien; Bo Lu; Naeem A Ali; Deborah A Levine; Scott K Aberegg; Stanley Lemeshow
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  Inequality in treatment use among elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction: USA, Belgium and Quebec.

Authors:  Julian Perelman; Amir Shmueli; Kathryn M McDonald; Louise Pilote; Olga Saynina; Marie-Christine Closon
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Does interhospital transfer improve outcome of acute myocardial infarction? A propensity score analysis from the Cardiovascular Cooperative Project.

Authors:  John M Westfall; Catarina I Kiefe; Norman W Weissman; Anthony Goudie; Robert M Centor; O Dale Williams; Jeroan J Allison
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 2.298

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.